Multimodal CMP Composition for Silicon Oxide Planarization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) methods for silicon oxide-containing substrates face challenges in achieving high removal rates without excessive erosion of silicon oxide within trenches, which is crucial for maintaining device performance and throughput in shallow trench isolation processes.

Innovation Solution

A CMP composition comprising ceria particles with specific size ranges, surface-modified silica or organic particles, and a polymer additive, along with a pH-adjusting agent, is used to create a multimodal particle size distribution, optimizing the polishing process to achieve efficient planarization with controlled removal rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high removal rates are used to increase device throughput, then productivity is improved, but trench erosion increases causing increased device defectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice throughputVSAvoiddevice defectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using a multimodal particle size distribution with specific weight percentages of different particle sizes (0.03-0.3 μm particles at 5-20 wt%, 0.3-1.0 μm particles at 30-70 wt%, and 1.0-3.0 μm particles at 5-20 wt%). This distribution optimizes the balance between removal rate and selectivity, allowing high throughput while minimizing trench erosion and device defectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite abrasive system combining three different particle size ranges in specific proportions. This composite approach creates synergistic effects where larger particles provide aggressive material removal for high productivity, while smaller particles provide precision control and selectivity to prevent trench erosion and maintain device reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If rapid blanket removal is achieved, then productivity is improved, but selectivity is worsened resulting in excessive trench erosion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblanket removal rateVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the particle size distribution parameters to achieve rapid blanket removal while maintaining selectivity. The specific weight percentages of different particle sizes (0.03-0.3 μm at 5-20 wt%, 0.3-1.0 μm at 30-70 wt%, 1.0-3.0 μm at 5-20 wt%) create a balanced system that provides both high removal rate and controlled selectivity, preventing excessive trench erosion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The multimodal particle size distribution provides local quality differentiation where smaller particles (0.03-0.3 μm) provide precision and selectivity for trench areas, while larger particles (1.0-3.0 μm) provide aggressive removal for blanket oxide areas. This spatial differentiation of particle functions enables simultaneous high productivity and maintained selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition effectively enhances removal rates and planarization efficiency while minimizing trench erosion, thereby improving device throughput and reducing defectivity.

Implementation Method 1

The polishing of the substrate typically is further aided by the chemical activity of the polishing composition and/or the mechanical activity of an abrasive suspended in the polishing composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The polishing of the substrate typically is further aided by the chemical activity of the polishing composition and/or the mechanical activity of an abrasive suspended in the polishing composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

The polishing of the substrate typically is further aided by the chemical activity of the polishing composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical activity: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP3470487B1Mixed abrasive polishing compositions
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 CMC MATERIALS INC

AI summary

The invention provides chemical-mechanical polishing compositions and methods of chemically-mechanically polishing a substrate with the chemical-mechanical polishing compositions. The polishing compositions comprise first abrasive particles, wherein the first abrasive particles are ceria particles, second abrasive particles, wherein the second abrasive particles are ceria particles, surface-modified silica particles, or organic particles, a pH-adjusting agent, and an aqueous carrier. The polishing compositions also exhibit multimodal particle size distributions.