Multimodal Electrical Modulation of Pain Using Composite Electromagnetic Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) therapies for chronic pain management rely on a single frequency electric field, which does not fully understand the mechanisms of pain relief and has limitations in efficacy and patient experience.

Innovation Solution

The development of a multimodal stimulation system that uses composite electromagnetic fields with multiple components of characteristic frequencies, amplitudes, and phase polarities, applied via an array of electrodes to neural structures, to modulate glial and neuronal interactions for pain relief.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional single-frequency electric field stimulation is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the pain relief efficacy and mechanism understanding are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief efficacyVSAvoidstimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stimulation signal is segmented into multiple frequency components (e.g., 50 Hz and 100 Hz) that can be independently controlled and applied to different neural structures. This allows targeted modulation of specific pain pathways while maintaining overall system manageability through modular signal generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts frequency, amplitude, and phase parameters of the electric field in real-time based on patient response and pain characteristics. This enables optimization of pain relief efficacy while adapting to individual neural responses without requiring permanent complex hardware configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multimodal composite electromagnetic fields are applied to modulate glial and neuronal interactions, then pain relief efficacy is improved, but the device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief efficacyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic alternating electric fields with specific frequency patterns (e.g., 50 Hz and 100 Hz cycles) that exploit neural oscillation characteristics. This periodic stimulation achieves enhanced glial and neuronal modulation efficiency, reducing the total energy required compared to continuous high-frequency stimulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously including frequency, amplitude, phase, and pulse width to optimize the electromagnetic field's interaction with neural tissues. By tuning these parameters, the system achieves superior pain relief with minimized power consumption through precise resonance with neural oscillations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional electric field stimulation is used, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the ability to modulate specific pain pathways and reduce paresthesia is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidpain pathway modulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stimulation program is segmented into distinct phases (priming phase and tonic phase) with different frequency characteristics. The priming phase uses higher frequencies to modulate glial cells and reduce inflammation, while the tonic phase uses lower frequencies for neuronal stimulation and pain gate control, allowing targeted pathway modulation without complicating the overall operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple stimulation modes (priming and tonic phases with different frequency characteristics) into a single unified device that can address various pain mechanisms. This multi-functional capability allows the device to modulate different pain pathways and reduce paresthesia while maintaining ease of operation through automated phase transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Duration of action of moving object

If single-frequency electric fields are used, then the device complexity is minimized, but the duration of pain relief and sustained efficacy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of pain reliefVSAvoidsignal generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a priming phase that performs preliminary modulation of glial cells and neural pathways before the main tonic stimulation. This preliminary action primes the neural system to respond more effectively to subsequent stimulation, extending the duration of pain relief by preventing rapid adaptation and maintaining therapeutic effects over longer periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous multimodal stimulation by seamlessly transitioning between priming and tonic phases, ensuring uninterrupted modulation of pain pathways. This continuous action prevents pain rebound effects and extends the overall duration of relief by maintaining neural plasticity changes and glial modulation throughout the treatment period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively modulates the expression of genes involved in pain pathways, reduces chronic pain by lowering nerve fiber depolarization thresholds, and minimizes power usage in implantable devices, providing sustained pain relief without paresthesia.

Implementation Method 1

an electromagnetic signal having multiple components of characteristic frequencies, amplitudes, and phase polarities... oscillating electromagnetic fields which is applied via an array of electrodes to a particular neural structure using temporal and amplitude characteristics, to modulate glial and neuronal interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field modulation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

lowering a threshold for depolarization of nerve fibers in the subject with a component of the composite electromagnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepolarization threshold modulation: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

activating glial cells by multimodal electromagnetic stimulation regulating any of genes for calcium binding proteins, cytokines, cell adhesion or specific immune response proteins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGene expression modulation:

Data Source

PatentUS12311177B2Method and apparatus for multi modal electrical modulation of pain using composite electromagnetic fields
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 MEDTRONIC SG LLC
  • US12311177B2 patent drawing
  • US12311177B2 patent drawing
  • US12311177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for managing pain uses a single composite modulation/stimulation signal with variable characteristics to achieve the same results as separate varying electromagnetic signals, including spinal cord stimulation or peripheral nerve stimulation.