Multimodal Reasoning for Semiconductor Fault Root-Cause Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional error diagnosis and diagnostic frameworks in semiconductor manufacturing rely on rule-based systems and static machine-learning models that struggle to process raw data patterns, lack multi-hop domain-specific reasoning, and require manual feature engineering, leading to slow and inefficient root-cause analysis and inadequate predictive maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A multimodal reasoning engine that encodes raw data into numerical vectors, searches a vector database, and traverses a self-evolving knowledge graph to identify probable causes and recommend corrective actions, integrating multimodal encoding with vector-based retrieval and multi-hop causal reasoning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule-based expert systems or static machine-learning models are used for error classification, then the system structure is simple and easy to implement, but the system cannot directly process raw data patterns, image-based maps, or unstructured sensor signals, requiring manual feature engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidautomated data processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual feature engineering (mechanical/process-based approach) with deep learning models that automatically extract features from raw data. The neural networks directly process unstructured sensor signals, images, and time-series data without requiring manual intervention to create feature representations, thereby substituting the mechanical feature engineering process with automated intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the machine learning models to automatically learn and extract relevant features from raw data patterns themselves. The models perform self-training and self-optimization through continuous learning from new data, eliminating the need for external manual feature engineering and enabling the system to adapt autonomously to new error patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If manually curated knowledge graphs are used to represent relationships between process parameters and failure mechanisms, then the knowledge representation is structured and interpretable, but the knowledge graphs remain static once deployed and require manual maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge representation qualityVSAvoidadaptability to new error patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static knowledge graphs into dynamic, self-evolving structures. The knowledge graphs continuously update themselves by incorporating new error patterns, failure mechanisms, and causal relationships discovered through ongoing data analysis. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to evolve its knowledge base automatically without manual re-curation, maintaining both structure and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where diagnostic outcomes and new error data continuously feed back into the knowledge graph. This feedback mechanism enables the knowledge graph to learn from actual operational data, refine its causal relationships, and adapt to emerging failure modes, thereby maintaining high-quality knowledge representation while gaining adaptability to new patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional diagnostic frameworks are used, then the system complexity is low, but the system cannot trace wafer-level anomalies to their chained upstream causes without significant manual correlation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidroot-cause analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex diagnostic task into multiple specialized components: deep learning models for feature extraction, vector databases for pattern matching, knowledge graphs for causal reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning engines for traceability. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific aspects of the diagnostic process efficiently, reducing overall system complexity while enabling comprehensive automated root-cause analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate structures such as vector representations and embedded knowledge graphs that act as mediators between raw data and final diagnoses. These intermediaries bridge the gap between different data types and reasoning processes, enabling automated tracing of causal chains without requiring complex direct correlations, thereby reducing both time and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If current AI retrieval and KG-based reasoning solutions are used, then the system can process structured text input, but the system lacks multi-hop, domain-specific reasoning needed for complex fault diagnosis or overlay error root-cause identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoiddomain-specific reasoning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite diagnostic system that integrates multiple specialized components: deep learning models for pattern recognition, vector databases for similarity search, knowledge graphs for causal relationships, and reasoning engines for multi-hop inference. This composite architecture combines the strengths of different approaches, enabling both comprehensive data processing and sophisticated domain-specific reasoning that neither component could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds new dimensions to the reasoning process by introducing multi-hop causal reasoning capabilities that traverse multiple levels of the knowledge graph. This dimensional expansion allows the system to move beyond simple pattern matching into deep causal analysis, tracing errors through multiple intermediate causes and effects to identify root causes in complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4693113A2Method and system for error diagnosis and predictive maintenance in semiconductor manufacturing using a multimodal reasoning engine
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • EP4693113A2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4693113A2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4693113A2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Described is a method and system for error diagnosis in a semiconductor manufacturing environment using multimodal data reasoning engine. Data representing a process, tool, or wafer condition, such as images, numerical measurement maps, or sensor signals, are encoded into numerical vector representations characterizing spatial and statistical features of a condition (e.g., error). A vector database storing vectors linked to metadata describing prior conditions is searched to identify similar representations. Metadata associated with the retrieved vectors is provided to a reasoning engine that accesses a knowledge graph defining causal relations among process modules, tool parameters, materials, and failure classes. The reasoning engine traverses multiple relations within the knowledge graph to determine a multi-hop causal path connecting the observed condition to probable root causes or corrective actions via intermediate. Continuous ingestion of process data and autonomous knowledge-graph updating enable adaptive diagnostics and predictive-maintenance capability across semiconductor manufacturing processes.