Multimodal Sensory Feedback for Balance Rehabilitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing and treating balance disorders, particularly those resulting from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), are inefficient and labor-intensive, relying on subjective human observations and lacking objective measurements for vestibular system deficiencies and rehabilitation progress.

Innovation Solution

A system and method providing multimodal sensory feedback, including visual, auditory, and vibrotactile cues, to guide and assess balance rehabilitation, using a combination of sensors to measure biomechanical states and adaptively modify feedback during tasks, allowing for personalized and dynamic adjustment of therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If subjective human observations are used for balance assessment, then the assessment can be performed with simple equipment, but the objectivity and precision of measurement are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of balance assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human observation with objective sensor-based measurement systems. Force plates, accelerometers, gyroscopes, and other sensors automatically capture biomechanical data, eliminating the need for therapist judgment and providing quantifiable, objective metrics for balance assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computer-based systems as intermediaries between the patient's movement and the assessment process. The computer processes sensor data, applies algorithms to evaluate balance performance, and generates objective reports, serving as a mediator that transforms raw biomechanical signals into meaningful clinical assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If therapist-directed exercises are used for balance rehabilitation, then the therapy can be customized to individual needs, but the process becomes labor-intensive and less efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of rehabilitation processVSAvoidreliance on therapist direction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables patients to perform balance exercises independently using the automated system. The computer provides real-time feedback through visual displays and haptic actuators, allowing patients to self-correct their movements and perform rehabilitation exercises without constant therapist supervision, thereby increasing productivity and reducing labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements real-time feedback loops where sensors monitor patient performance, the computer processes the data, and immediate feedback is provided through visual displays or haptic actuators. This automated feedback mechanism replaces therapist direction, enabling efficient independent exercise performance while maintaining personalized therapy protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If static feedback methods are used for balance training, then the system is simpler to implement, but the ability to adapt to dynamic movement and changing patient needs is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic movementVSAvoidcomplexity of feedback system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static to dynamic feedback systems. The system continuously tracks patient movement in real-time using sensors and adjusts feedback accordingly. Haptic actuators and visual displays dynamically modify feedback based on movement phase, speed, and direction, enabling the system to adapt to dynamic movements and changing patient needs throughout the rehabilitation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic feedback delivery synchronized with the patient's movement cycle. The system detects movement phases and provides feedback at optimal moments within each cycle, creating a rhythmic interaction that enhances learning and adaptation while managing system complexity through structured timing patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor arrays are deployed to measure biomechanical states, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of biomechanical measurementVSAvoidnumber of sensors and components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor types (force plates, accelerometers, gyroscopes, optical trackers) into an integrated measurement system. By merging these sensors into a coordinated network that shares data processing and control infrastructure, the system achieves comprehensive biomechanical measurement precision while managing overall device complexity through integration rather than separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10258259B1Multimodal sensory feedback system and method for treatment and assessment of disequilibrium, balance and motion disorders
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 ZETS GARY
  • US10258259B1 patent drawing
  • US10258259B1 patent drawing
  • US10258259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a system and method for measuring the biomechanical state of a subject using various sensors simultaneously with providing the subject with visual exercises for rehabilitation and assessment of disequilibrium, balance and motion disorders. The biomechanical state of a subject is measured during the subject's performance of a predetermined task. Such measurements are useful for the assessment of disequilibrium, balance and motion disorders and are also useful for the determination of therapeutic application of vibrotactile, auditory, or visual feedback to a subject during the subject's attempt to perform a predetermined task. An intelligent controller compares the subject's biomechanical state to a predetermined parameter to determine a variance. If the variance exceeds a threshold, feedback in the form of visual feedback, vibrotactile feedback or auditory feedback may be provided to the subject as a therapeutic means for enabling the subject to compensate for disorder effects.