Multi-Mode Heat Exchanger Assembly for Latent Cooling and Reheat

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thermal management systems are inefficient in controlling both sensible and latent heat in environmental air, often requiring additional energy and having a large footprint, making them unsuitable for scalable and compact applications.

Innovation Solution

A multi-mode thermal management assembly with a selectable coolant flow path that includes two heat exchangers in series, allowing for counter-flow routing of the coolant, enabling latent heat removal and sensible reheat without additional energy input, and is designed to be compact, scalable, and adaptable for various environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a phase change heat exchange system is used, then latent cooling capability is improved, but system complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatent cooling capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchange system is divided into separate latent heat exchanger and sensible heat exchanger components, each handling specific thermal management functions. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while maintaining overall system effectiveness for both latent and sensible cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchange assembly is designed to perform multiple functions including latent cooling, sensible cooling, and reheat operations through a single integrated unit with selectable coolant flow paths. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate phase change systems while achieving comprehensive thermal management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a phase change heat exchange system is used, then latent cooling capability is improved, but additional energy consumption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatent cooling capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures waste heat from the latent cooling process and redirects it through the sensible heat exchanger to provide reheat functionality. This converts what would otherwise be wasted thermal energy into a useful heating function, eliminating additional energy consumption for reheat operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers thermal energy from the coolant after it passes through the latent heat exchanger by routing it through the sensible heat exchanger. This recovery process utilizes the temperature differential to provide sensible cooling and reheat functions without requiring additional energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If a traditional heat exchange system is used, then cooling function is provided, but footprint size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling functionVSAvoidfoot print
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The latent heat exchanger and sensible heat exchanger are merged into a single integrated heat exchange assembly with shared coolant flow paths and structural components. This consolidation achieves comprehensive thermal management (both latent and sensible cooling plus reheat) in a compact footprint that is smaller than separate traditional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchangers are arranged in a vertical configuration with coolant entering and exiting from the bottom, utilizing vertical space rather than horizontal footprint. This dimensional reorganization allows the system to maintain effective heat exchange surface area while minimizing the floor space required for installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If heat exchangers are arranged in series, then thermal efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates selectable coolant flow paths with valves that allow dynamic switching between different operational modes (latent cooling mode, sensible cooling mode, combination mode). This dynamic configuration capability enables the system to optimize thermal efficiency for different environmental conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces both temperature and absolute humidity without additional energy consumption, is compact and scalable, and can be easily integrated into small spaces, offering flexible operation modes and efficient thermal management.

Implementation Method 1

the latent heat exchanger cools and dehumidifies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

two heat exchangers (coolers), each having side-by-side vertical paths whereby coolant both enters and exits from the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

the routing of the working fluid can be routed in a counter-flow orientation in each heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the routing of the working fluid can be routed in a counter-flow orientation in each heat exchanger. This advantageously allows for an appropriate temperature differential (between the working fluid and the air) on each side of the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-flow heat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10088241B1Multi-mode heat exchange system for sensible and/or latent thermal management
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 ENGENDREN CORP
  • US10088241B1 patent drawing
  • US10088241B1 patent drawing
  • US10088241B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a multi-mode thermal management assembly with a selectable coolant flow path, and in particular to an assembly that selectably removes latent and/or sensible heat. Coolant (working fluid) is routed through openings in the bottom of the thermal management assembly. The assembly can have two heat exchangers (coolers), each having side-by-side vertical paths whereby coolant both enters and exits from the heat exchangers at their respective bottoms. Plumbing is provided that can be selected to route coolant for one of the user selected cooling modes. Valves allow the user to select at least between a combination mode (latent cooling with sensible reheat) and a sensible only cooling mode. In the combination mode, the latent heat exchanger cools and dehumidifies, and the sensible heat exchanger partially reheats the air while requiring no additional work to be done on the system by external power consuming devices.