Multi-Mode Receiver Switching for Spectral Efficiency Under ISI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communications methods and systems are overly power hungry and spectrally inefficient, failing to effectively manage non-linearity and inter-symbol interference (ISI) in communication channels.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a low-complexity, highly-spectrally efficient communication system using a multi-mode transmitter and receiver configuration, which includes a mapper, pulse shaping filter, timing pilot insertion, equalization and sequence estimation circuit, and de-mapping circuit, optimized for partial response signaling to improve tolerance to non-linearity and ISI.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional communications methods are used, then power consumption is high, but spectral efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver dynamically switches between different operating modes (first mode with near-zero ISI filter and second mode with partial response filter) based on channel conditions and signal characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the trade-off between power consumption and spectral efficiency by selecting the appropriate mode for each transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the filter characteristics parameter by selecting between different filter types (near-zero ISI versus partial response) depending on the operating mode. This parameter change enables the receiver to achieve better spectral efficiency in the second mode while managing power consumption through selective mode activation based on signal quality and channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If near-zero ISI pulse shaping filter is used, then power consumption is reduced, but spectral efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver dynamically switches between different operating modes (first mode with near-zero ISI filter and second mode with partial response filter) based on channel conditions and signal characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the trade-off between power consumption and spectral efficiency by selecting the appropriate mode for each transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If partial response pulse shaping filter is used, then spectral efficiency is improved, but tolerance to non-linearity and ISI decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidtolerance to non-linearity and ISI
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver dynamically switches between different operating modes (first mode with near-zero ISI filter and second mode with partial response filter) based on channel conditions and signal characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the trade-off between power consumption and spectral efficiency by selecting the appropriate mode for each transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to detect channel conditions, signal quality, and error rates, then adjusts the operating mode accordingly. This feedback enables the receiver to switch to the first mode when non-linearity and ISI are severe, thereby maintaining reliability while still allowing spectral efficiency improvements when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If multi-mode operation is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to channel conditionsVSAvoidreceiver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver dynamically switches between different operating modes (first mode with near-zero ISI filter and second mode with partial response filter) based on channel conditions and signal characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the trade-off between power consumption and spectral efficiency by selecting the appropriate mode for each transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8842778B2Multi-mode receiver for highly-spectrally-efficient communications
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8842778B2 patent drawing
  • US8842778B2 patent drawing
  • US8842778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver may be dynamically configurable, during run-time, into a plurality of modes of operation. In a first mode of operation the receiver may demodulate received signals having relative low inter-symbol correlation using a near zero ISI filter and symbol slicing. In a second mode of operation the receiver may demodulate received signals having relatively high inter-symbol correlation using an input filter configured to achieve a desired total partial response and a sequence estimation algorithm.