Multi-Mode Wireless Node Adaptation for Mesh Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless multihop mesh networks face challenges with unreliable links due to intermittent signals, obstructions, and limited scalability, particularly in ad hoc networks where centralized timing control is impractical for coordinating multi-mode communications.

Innovation Solution

A distributed, loosely coupled network architecture that allows nodes to operate in both short-range and long-range communication modes, enabling localized control for mode transitions based on available neighbors and connectivity requirements, ensuring adaptability and self-organization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized timing control is used to coordinate multi-mode communications, then communication coordination is improved, but network scalability and adaptability deteriorate due to the restrictive and impractical nature of centralized control in ad hoc networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication coordinationVSAvoidnetwork scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Each node autonomously manages its own communication mode transitions and neighbor associations without requiring centralized coordination. Nodes independently evaluate their local environment, select appropriate communication modes (short-range or long-range), and establish connections with neighbors, enabling the network to self-organize and scale dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The network is divided into independent node entities that each make local decisions about communication mode selection. Instead of a single centralized controller managing the entire network, each node segment operates autonomously, evaluating its own neighbors and selecting communication modes based on local conditions, thereby improving scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If nodes operate in multiple communication modes, then adaptability and data throughput are improved, but coordination complexity and delay increase without centralized timing control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication mode flexibilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Nodes dynamically transition between short-range and long-range communication modes based on real-time evaluation of neighbor availability and connectivity requirements. The system adapts its communication mode selection to changing network conditions, allowing nodes to switch modes as needed without fixed time schedules or centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes change communication parameters such as transmission power, modulation scheme, and frequency based on the selected communication mode. The system adjusts these parameters dynamically according to whether short-range or long-range mode is chosen, enabling adaptability while keeping coordination simple through autonomous node decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If nodes continuously monitor for neighbor connection requests, then connection establishment speed is improved, but energy consumption and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection establishment speedVSAvoidnode energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Nodes perform periodic monitoring and evaluation of neighbor connections rather than continuous monitoring. The system checks for neighbor availability and connection opportunities at regular intervals, balancing the need for fast connection establishment with energy conservation by avoiding constant transmission and reception activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes independently determine when to initiate connection requests based on their own communication needs and evaluated neighbor availability. Instead of continuously monitoring and reacting to all potential connections, nodes self-regulate their monitoring and connection initiation based on local requirements, reducing unnecessary energy consumption and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10278113B2Dynamically-selectable multi-modal modulation in wireless multihop networks
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US10278113B2 patent drawing
  • US10278113B2 patent drawing
  • US10278113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a self-organizing wireless multihop network, each node device selects operation among short-range (SR) and long-range (LR) communication modes, among which the SR mode uses a higher data rate than the LR mode. Each node device advertises connectivity link availability for neighboring node devices, and selectively initiates a link in response to connectivity availability advertised by at least one neighboring node device. The availability advertising is performed in the SR and the LR communication modes, according to a periodicity that is dynamically-variable in response to prevailing circumstances in the local neighborhood. The link initiation is selectively performed in one of either the SR or the LR communication mode based on selection criteria that include data throughput performance associated with different neighboring node devices with which connectivity is available via a certain communication mode.