Multi-Node Computer Shared Power and Cooling Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face significant energy consumption and cooling challenges due to increasing demand for computer resources, leading to higher energy costs, emissions, and infrastructure strain, with existing incremental improvements not sufficient to reduce power consumption to 2000 levels.

Innovation Solution

The GreenMachine multi-node computer system, which comprises a plurality of nodes, a system control unit, and a carrier board, providing integrated shared resources, efficient power management, and cooling control, using sub-5 W processors and flash memory technology to achieve a compact, energy-efficient architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data centers increase computer resources to meet growing demand, then processing capability is improved, but energy consumption increases five-fold since 2000

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the data center into multiple independent blade servers, each capable of autonomous operation. This segmentation allows for granular power management where individual blades can be powered down or placed in low-power states when not needed, while maintaining overall system processing capability through selective activation of only necessary blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements shared resources including a common power supply unit, cooling infrastructure, and storage systems that serve multiple blade servers simultaneously. This multi-functionality reduces redundant components and lowers overall energy consumption while maintaining the processing capability of individual blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If data centers expand power and cooling infrastructure to support increased server density, then processing capability is improved, but capital expenses and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveserver densityVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple blade servers into a single integrated chassis with shared power supplies, cooling systems, and management infrastructure. This consolidation increases server density while reducing the overall complexity of infrastructure components, as single shared resources replace multiple redundant systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The blade server architecture transitions from horizontal rack mounting to vertical stacking within standardized chassis units. This dimensional change allows for higher density placement while maintaining standardized power and cooling connections, reducing infrastructure complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If traditional cooling systems are used for high-density server racks, then processing capability is maintained, but cooling efficiency becomes insufficient and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompute performanceVSAvoidcooling energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements zone-based cooling control where different regions of the chassis receive customized cooling based on local heat generation patterns. Each blade server or group of blades can have independent cooling adjustments, optimizing cooling efficiency by directing refrigerant or airflow precisely to high-heat areas rather than uniformly cooling the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Use of energy by moving object

If blade servers are used to improve energy efficiency, then power consumption is reduced incrementally, but the reduction is not sufficient to reach 2000 energy levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidenergy efficiency improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power management that automatically adjusts the operational state of individual blade servers based on real-time workload demands. Blades can be dynamically activated, deactivated, or shifted to low-power modes, enabling much more aggressive energy reduction than static configurations while maintaining productivity through on-demand resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The GreenMachine system achieves a 10× or more improvement in power, space, and cooling efficiency over current computer architectures, enabling a compact and cost-effective design that reduces energy consumption and emissions while maintaining high performance.

Implementation Method 1

A cooling system forces air flow between the nodes to cool the nodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS10467021B2High density multi node computer with improved efficiency, thermal control, and compute performance
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 TMNCO INC
  • US10467021B2 patent drawing
  • US10467021B2 patent drawing
  • US10467021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-node computer system, comprising: a plurality of nodes, a system control unit and a carrier board. Each node of the plurality of nodes comprises a processor and a memory. The system control unit is responsible for: power management, cooling, workload provisioning, native storage servicing, and I/O. The carrier board comprises a system fabric and a plurality of electrical connections. The electrical connections provide the plurality of nodes with power, management controls, system connectivity between the system control unit and the plurality of nodes, and an external network connection to a user infrastructure. The system control unit and the carrier board provide integrated, shared resources for the plurality of nodes. The multi-node computer system is provided in a single enclosure.