Multi-Path Control Path Switching for PWM-Linear Transition Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-path control systems for power output electronics, such as audio amplifiers and motor drivers, do not optimally select control paths and timing based on current output values or input signal levels, leading to suboptimal efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an output driver with two control paths and a control circuit that selects between them based on input signal amplitude and slew rate, delaying switching to compensate for response time, ensuring optimal path selection and minimizing noise and distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If path selection is based entirely on current output value or input signal level, then the control system is simple to operate, but the efficiency and accuracy are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidpath selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The path selection mechanism transitions from static (based solely on current output value) to dynamic (considering both current output value and rate of change). The control circuit now adapts path selection based on real-time signal characteristics, optimizing efficiency without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for path selection from only amplitude-based criteria to include both amplitude and slew rate. This allows the control system to make more informed decisions about path selection, improving overall efficiency while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If switching between control paths is immediate based on signal level, then the response time is fast, but noise and distortion increase during transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidnoise and distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit evaluates both the current signal level and the rate of change before initiating a path transition. This preliminary evaluation ensures that switching occurs at optimal moments, preventing transitions during high-rate-change periods that would generate noise and distortion, while still maintaining fast response when conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from both the amplitude signal and the slew rate signal to determine when to switch paths. This dual-feedback mechanism allows the control circuit to monitor transition conditions in real-time and delay switching if necessary to avoid generating harmful noise and distortion, thereby reducing harmful factors while maintaining acceptable response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If PWM control is used for large excursions, then power efficiency is high, but distortion and offset error increase near the commanded value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoiddistortion and offset error
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between PWM and linear control modes based on real-time evaluation of both signal amplitude and rate of change. Near the commanded value, the system transitions to linear control to minimize distortion and offset error, while maintaining PWM control during large excursions to preserve power efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from fixed PWM mode to adaptive mode selection between PWM and linear control. By monitoring both amplitude and slew rate, the system adjusts the control mode parameter to optimize the trade-off between power efficiency and precision at different operating points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If linear control is used when output is close to commanded value, then distortion and offset error are reduced, but power efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistortion and offset errorVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the control mode based on the operating point. Linear control is activated only when both the amplitude and slew rate indicate the system is near the commanded value, minimizing distortion while avoiding unnecessary use of linear control that would reduce power efficiency during larger excursions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control mode parameter is changed from static to adaptive, allowing the system to switch between linear and PWM control based on real-time evaluation of signal characteristics. This ensures linear control is used only when necessary for precision, maintaining power efficiency during other operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11940827B1Management of path selection in a multi-path control system
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 CIRRUS LOGIC INC
  • US11940827B1 patent drawing
  • US11940827B1 patent drawing
  • US11940827B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic control system provides selectable path operation, such as linear and pulse-width modulated (PWM) operation and provides path transition management to improve operation. The system supplies a current or a voltage to a load in response to an input signal or value and includes an output driver, and multiple selectable control paths. The system includes a control circuit that selects between the first control path and the second control path in response to a path selection indication to drive the output driver. The system may include an evaluator that determines the path selection indication in conformity with an amplitude and a slew rate of the input. One or all of the control paths may have a response time to changes in the input signal or value, and the control circuit may delay switching from the second control path to the first control path to compensate for the response time.