Multi-Phase Cabinet Layout for Scalable Modular Energy Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy systems with multiple sources or sinks are not well-suited for high-power industrial applications, lacking optimized methods for installation and interconnection of multi-phase module-based energy systems.

Innovation Solution

A modular energy system framework that includes multiple modules with energy sources and converters, allowing for various configurations and control mechanisms to manage power distribution, balance parameters like State of Charge and temperature, and adjust system capacity, using a housing framework for efficient installation and data connectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If modular energy systems are designed for industrial-scale power applications, then power capability and energy capacity are improved, but system complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The energy system is divided into multiple independent modules, each containing an energy source and converter. These modules can be connected in series or parallel configurations to achieve desired power and voltage levels, making the complex system manageable through standardized building blocks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a multi-dimensional array configuration where modules are arranged not just in simple series/parallel but in spatial arrays with multiple connection dimensions, enabling flexible scaling of power capability while maintaining modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple modules are connected in series or parallel configurations, then electrical performance and power output are improved, but interconnection complexity and installation difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical performanceVSAvoidinterconnection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each module is designed with universal connection interfaces that can accommodate both series and parallel configurations. The standardized terminals and connection mechanisms allow the same module to function in different electrical configurations without requiring different connection hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic reconfiguration of module connections during operation or maintenance. Modules can be added, removed, or repositioned in the array without requiring complete system disassembly, enabling flexible adaptation to different electrical performance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If system capacity is increased for industrial applications, then energy provision capability is improved, but space requirements and installation footprint increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidinstallation footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Modules are designed with compact, space-efficient internal arrangements where components are nested or tightly integrated. The converter and energy source are positioned to minimize overall module footprint while maintaining electrical performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Reliability

If modules are independently controlled to balance parameters like SOC and temperature, then system reliability and lifespan are improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each module is equipped with sensors that continuously monitor parameters such as state of charge, temperature, and electrical conditions. This feedback is used by the control system to adjust module operation in real-time, balancing parameters across the array to prevent overheating, optimize charge distribution, and extend lifespan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically balances parameters across modules without requiring external intervention. Modules that are running hot or have higher state of charge automatically reduce their output or adjust their operation, while modules with lower parameters increase their contribution, creating a self-balancing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11923782B2Multi-phase module-based energy system frameworks and methods related thereto
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 TAE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11923782B2 patent drawing
  • US11923782B2 patent drawing
  • US11923782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A housing and/or installation frameworks for a modular multi-level energy system includes a set of similar cabinets configured for orthogonal (e.g., vertical and horizontal) alignment of the modules. The cabinets are configured so modules of a particular phase are oriented along an axis parallel to a reference plane. Modules of the same level of the multi-level arrangement but of different phases are mounted in each cabinet, arranged such that a module for each phase is a defined distance from the reference plane. The cabinets are arranged equidistant and orthogonal to the reference plane, minimizing distance for connections between modules of the same phase across multiple cabinets, and facilitating convenient addition or removal of levels. The framework also facilitates data and reference signal connections between local control devices of the modules, and between the local control devices and a master control device for the system.