Multiphase Electromagnetic Machine Control via Position-Based Current Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling multiphase electromagnetic machines with multiple phases becomes complex due to the need for coordinated current management across phases, leading to challenges in reducing system losses, increasing efficiency, and mitigating failures.

Innovation Solution

A control system determines desired electromagnetic forces between a translator and stator by using position information and objective functions, optimizing current values across phases while adhering to constraints to ensure efficient operation and adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coordinated current management across multiple phases is implemented, then electromagnetic force control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic force controlVSAvoidcurrent management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the multiphase current management into independent phase controllers, each handling a specific phase. This allows coordinated control of multiple phases while reducing overall system complexity through modular design. Each phase controller independently manages its phase's current based on position feedback and force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts current distribution across phases based on real-time position information and force requirements. The controller continuously optimizes which phases are active and their respective current levels, adapting to changing operating conditions. This dynamic approach simplifies control by activating only necessary phases rather than managing all phases continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If optimization of current values across phases is performed, then system efficiency is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem lossesVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies partial action by optimizing current values only for the subset of phases that are currently active or most effective at given positions. Rather than continuously optimizing all phases, the system focuses computational resources on relevant phases, reducing computational complexity while maintaining efficiency improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization algorithm uses position information and force requirements to automatically determine optimal current distribution without requiring external intervention or complex iterative calculations. The system self-adjusts current values based on pre-established relationships between position, force, and optimal phase excitation patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If position-based force determination is implemented, then control precision is improved, but measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce control precisionVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces position information as an intermediary variable that mediates between physical position and force control. Rather than directly measuring force or current in each phase, the controller uses position feedback to determine optimal force generation strategies. This intermediary approach simplifies measurement requirements while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages current distribution across phases, enhancing efficiency, reducing losses, and mitigating failures by optimizing current values based on position and objective functions, thereby improving the overall performance of multiphase electromagnetic machines.

Implementation Method 1

determining a set of current values applied to at least one of the phases based at least in part on the desired electromagnetic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

determining a desired electromagnetic force between a translator and a stator of the multiphase electromagnetic machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP2823561B1Methods and systems for controlling a multiphase electromagnetic machine
Publication Date: 2022.12.07 MAINSPRING ENERGY INC
  • EP2823561B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2823561B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2823561B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A multiphase electromagnetic machine may be controlled by controlling currents in one or more phases of the multiphase electromagnetic machine. A control system may be used to determine how much current to deliver to, or extract from, each phase. The control system may use an objective function, subject to one or more constraints, to determine the current. The control system may use position information to determine the objective function, constraints, or both.