Multiphase Steel Sheet Balancing Strength, Ductility, and Bendability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing steel sheets used for automobile members lack high strength, excellent ductility, high yield ratio (YR), and excellent bendability, and the production methods require large annealing facilities and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A steel sheet with a controlled microstructure comprising specific area ratios of ferrite, martensite, bainite, and retained austenite, along with controlled carbon concentration in austenite, is produced through a defined hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, and cooling process, ensuring high tensile strength, ductility, and bendability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of steel sheet is increased, then tensile strength is improved, but ductility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters (C: 0.10-0.30%, Si: 0.05-2.50%, Mn: 1.00-3.00%, Al: 0.005-2.50%) and microstructure parameters (area ratios of ferrite, martensite, bainite, and retained austenite) to achieve a balance between strength and ductility. The controlled distribution of multiple phases with specific proportions resolves the contradiction by allowing high strength from martensite while maintaining ductility through ferrite and retained austenite.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of four distinct phases: ferrite, martensite, bainite, and retained austenite. Each phase contributes different properties - ferrite provides ductility, martensite provides strength, bainite provides toughness, and retained austenite provides formability. This multi-phase composite structure resolves the strength-ductility contradiction by combining the advantages of different microstructural phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the yield ratio is increased to improve member strength, then press-forming strength is improved, but formability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield ratioVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention controls the yield ratio parameter within 0.30≤YR<0.60 by adjusting the microstructure phase proportions, particularly maintaining 10-50% retained austenite which provides TRIP effect for formability while controlling ferrite and martensite ratios to achieve the desired yield ratio range. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between yield ratio and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-phase composite microstructure resolves the yield ratio-formability contradiction by combining phases with complementary properties. The retained austenite (10-50%) transforms during forming to provide the TRIP effect, maintaining formability even with higher yield ratio, while the ferrite-martensite-bainite matrix provides the necessary strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If annealing time is extended to stabilize retained austenite, then ductility is improved, but facility size and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveductilityVSAvoidfacility size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by controlling the chemical composition (particularly Si: 0.05-2.50% and Al: 0.005-2.50%) before the annealing process to facilitate retained austenite stabilization. The pre-added Si and Al elements promote austenite stability during subsequent short-time annealing, eliminating the need for extended hold times and large annealing facilities while still achieving the required 10-50% retained austenite for excellent ductility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters (Si and Al content) to alter the annealing process requirements. By optimizing these compositional parameters, the patent achieves retained austenite stabilization with shorter annealing times, thereby reducing facility size requirements while maintaining excellent ductility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The steel sheet achieves high strength, excellent ductility, and high YR, making it suitable for complex automobile frame structural members with improved formability and reduced facility costs.

Implementation Method 1

the steel microstructure comprising: area ratio of ferrite: 5% or more and 65% or less, area ratio of martensite: 10% or more and 60% or less, area ratio of bainite: 10% or more and 60% or less, and area ratio of retained austenite: 5% or more

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

average solute C concentration of the retained austenite is 0.5 mass % or more, and standard deviation of C concentration distribution in the retained austenite is 0.250 mass % or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS12584186B2Steel sheet, member, method of producing steel sheet, and method of producing member
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 JFE STEEL CORP
  • US12584186B2 patent drawing
  • US12584186B2 patent drawing
  • US12584186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steel sheet having high strength, excellent ductility, high YR, and excellent bendability. The steel sheet includes a defined chemical composition, the steel microstructure includes: area ratio of ferrite: 5% or more and 65% or less, area ratio of martensite: 10% or more and 60% or less, area ratio of bainite: 10% or more and 60% or less, and area ratio of retained austenite: 5% or more. The relationship in the following Formula (1) is satisfied. Average solute C concentration of the retained austenite [C]γ is 0.5 mass % or more, and standard deviation of C concentration distribution in the retained austenite is 0.250 mass % or less.[Mn]γ⁢/[Mn]≤1.2(1)