Multiphase Tracer System for Drilling Lag Time Estimation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for measuring lag time in drilling operations are inaccurate due to difficulties in identifying introduced particulate among drill cuttings and variations in settling rates of cuttings and gases, leading to potential hole cleaning problems and other drilling issues.
Innovation Solution
A multiphase tracer system is introduced into the drilling fluid, comprising a solid tracer and a fluid tracer (liquid or gaseous) that allows for the measurement of differential lag times between cuttings, liquids, and gases, enabling precise estimation of their transport rates through the wellbore.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If introduced particulate is used to measure lag time, then lag time measurement is possible, but identification of particulate among drill cuttings becomes difficult leading to measurement error
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces particulate with distinctive visual characteristics (color changes) that enable easy identification among drill cuttings. The particulate is specifically selected or treated to have color properties that contrast with natural drill cuttings, allowing operators to easily distinguish and track the introduced particulate for accurate lag time measurement without confusion with formation materials.
2Ease of operation
If drilling is stopped temporarily, then operational adjustments can be made, but cuttings settling rate varies causing lag time divergence between cuttings and fluid
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses an intermediary substance (introduced particulate) that behaves consistently with the drilling fluid during stoppages. The particulate is selected to have density and flow characteristics that match the drilling fluid, ensuring it remains suspended and travels with the fluid even when drilling stops. This intermediary approach allows lag time measurement to remain accurate despite operational stoppages and cuttings settling.
3Device complexity
If theoretical lag time calculation is used, then measurement process is simple, but accuracy is insufficient for practical drilling operations
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a self-service measurement system where the introduced particulate automatically tracks the drilling fluid's movement without requiring external intervention. The particulate is passively carried by the drilling fluid flow, and its arrival time at the surface automatically provides the lag time measurement. This self-service approach maintains operational simplicity while achieving high measurement accuracy, as the particulate naturally follows the fluid path and timing is recorded automatically.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enables accurate estimation of lag times for solids, liquids, and gases, helping to identify transport issues and prevent problems like hole cleaning and wellbore consolidation, thereby improving drilling efficiency and safety.
Implementation Method 1
drilling fluid (mud) is pumped downhole while drilling a subterranean wellbore. The fluid emerges from the drill string at the drill bit and creates an upward flow through the wellbore annulus
Implementation Method 2
When stopped, the cuttings begin to settle in the annulus at a settling rate (or rates) that depend on the density, size, and shape of the cuttings particles
Implementation Method 3
formation gases (and other gases) may rise towards to the surface
Data Source
AI summary
A method for estimating a differential lag time while drilling includes introducing a multiphase tracer into drilling fluid circulating in a wellbore while drilling. The multiphase tracer includes a solid tracer and a fluid tracer in which the fluid tracer includes at least one of a liquid tracer or a gaseous tracer. A first arrival time of the solid tracer and a second arrival time of the fluid tracer are measured at a surface location and evaluated to estimate the differential lag time. The differential lag time includes at least one of a difference between a cuttings lag time and a gaseous lag time or a difference between the cuttings lag time and a liquid lag time.


