Multi-Phase Traction Surface for Higher Sliding Friction in EHL

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing materials fail to enhance sliding friction effectively in the elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) regime, where friction is typically low, limiting their application in technologies like tires and synovial joints.

Innovation Solution

A multi-phase material (MPM) with zones of different Young's moduli, where the moduli differ by at least a factor of 3, is used to create a traction surface with a center-to-center radial distribution function peak between 1 μm and 10 mm, enhancing sliding friction through unstable deformation and energy dissipation in the EHL regime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a uniform material surface is used in EHL conditions, then the material structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but sliding friction is low and cannot be enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding frictionVSAvoidmaterial structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating zones of different moduli within the traction surface. Specifically, it incorporates a soft phase (lower modulus) and a hard phase (higher modulus) in specific spatial arrangements. This local differentiation of material properties allows the surface to exhibit enhanced sliding friction in EHL conditions while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through defined zone structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining two distinct phases with different mechanical properties (moduli differing by at least a factor of 3). The soft phase and hard phase are integrated into a multi-phase material structure where each phase contributes differently to the overall friction behavior, achieving synergistic enhancement of sliding friction that neither phase could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If zones of different moduli are introduced to enhance friction, then sliding friction increases synergistically, but the material structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding frictionVSAvoidmulti-phase structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the modulus parameter across different zones. The soft phase has a modulus E1 and the hard phase has a modulus E2, where E2/E1 ≥ 3. This parameter differentiation is combined with specific spatial arrangements (such as the hard phase forming a network or the phases being arranged in alternating patterns) to optimize friction enhancement while controlling structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If the modulus difference between zones is increased, then friction enhancement ratio increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction enhancement ratioVSAvoidzone distribution precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies that the hard phase zones should have a center-to-center radial distribution function with a peak at between 1 μm and 10 mm. This quantitative specification of spatial distribution provides clear manufacturing guidance while ensuring the friction enhancement effect. The localized arrangement of hard phases in a matrix of soft phase creates the necessary modulus contrast without requiring excessive manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MPM exhibits a synergistic increase in sliding friction, with enhancement ratios up to 3, significantly higher than expected, due to energy absorption and dissipation by the lubricant as it is drawn into and pushed out of the recess created by the indenter, optimizing performance in EHL conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the sudden local transition in compliance between the zones provides a mechanism for unstable deformation and dissipation of energy—i.e., a new form of Elastic Hysteresis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic Hysteresis: Hysteresis

Implementation Method 2

the energy lost through the process of indentation of the surface as the modulus changes across the surface is a major mechanism behind the friction enhancement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Damping

Implementation Method 3

M1 and M2 having first and second Young moduli respectively, the first and second moduli differing by at least a factor of 3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

the sudden local transition in compliance between the zones provides a mechanism for unstable deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 5

based on the observation described herein of sudden rapid and periodic radial fluid flow in the contact region of the indenter, it appears that this energy is being dissipated through the lubricating fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow: Convection

Implementation Method 6

this energy is being dissipated through the lubricating fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous dissipation: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12023961B2Material with enhanced sliding friction
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • US12023961B2 patent drawing
  • US12023961B2 patent drawing
  • US12023961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An article of manufacture comprising: (a) a body at least a portion of which is a multi-phase material (MPM) defining a traction surface; (b) the MPM comprising at least first and second zones comprising first and second materials, M1, M2, respectively, at or near the traction surface, the M1 and M2 having first and second Young moduli respectively, the first and second moduli differing by at least a factor of 3; and (c) wherein each of the second zones has a center, and wherein the second zones have a center-to-center radial distribution function having a peak at between 10 μm and 10 mm.