Multipiece Road Wheel Structure for Lightweight Load Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing road wheel designs face challenges in balancing weight reduction with structural integrity and manufacturing complexity, particularly in resisting deflection and strain under loading while maintaining vehicle clearance and ease of manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A multipiece road wheel assembly comprising two rim halves connected via fasteners, with a hollow cavity and a dovetail connection, using additive manufacturing and machining to create a lightweight yet strong structure that resists deformation and supports elastomeric pads with reduced material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single-piece road wheel design is used, then structural integrity is improved, but weight increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidroad wheel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The road wheel is divided into multiple separate components including a rim assembly with first and second rim halves, a hub assembly, and a disc assembly. These segments are connected through fasteners and interference fits, allowing each component to be optimized independently for weight while maintaining overall structural integrity through the segmented architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If a single-piece road wheel design is used, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The road wheel is divided into multiple separate components including a rim assembly with first and second rim halves, a hub assembly, and a disc assembly. These segments are connected through fasteners and interference fits, allowing each component to be optimized independently for weight while maintaining overall structural integrity through the segmented architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple rim halves are merged together to form the complete rim structure, and the hub assembly is merged with the disc assembly through interference fits and fasteners. This merging of separate components creates a unified structure that achieves structural integrity comparable to single-piece designs while enabling simplified manufacturing of individual parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If material is added to resist deflection and strain, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to deflection and strainVSAvoidroad wheel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rim assembly includes localized thickening at the cantilevered end region where the elastomeric pad is mounted, providing increased strength and resistance to deflection and strain exactly where needed. The rest of the rim structure maintains a lighter gauge, optimizing the weight-strength ratio by concentrating material only in the critical load-bearing area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The road wheel employs composite construction combining different materials and structures: the rim assembly uses aluminum alloy with localized thickening, the hub assembly uses a different aluminum alloy composition, and the elastomeric pad provides additional damping and strain absorption. This composite approach allows each material to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall weight while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If radial stiffening ribs are added, then structural strength is improved, but device complexity increases and debris accumulation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional radial stiffening ribs that extend into the hollow interior of the road wheel have been removed. Instead, structural strength is achieved through the segmented rim and hub assemblies connected by fasteners and interference fits, which provide stiffness without the complexity and debris-trapping issues of internal ribs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Strength

If undercuts are created for wear ring support, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear ring support strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A separate wear ring component is introduced as an intermediary element that provides the necessary support structure without requiring difficult undercut geometries. The wear ring is mounted in a simple recess in the rim assembly and secured with fasteners, eliminating the need for complex undercut areas while still providing adequate support for the elastomeric pad and resistance to external loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11912064B2Multipiece road wheel
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 HUTCHINSON SA
  • US11912064B2 patent drawing
  • US11912064B2 patent drawing
  • US11912064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A road wheel for a tracked vehicle includes a first rim half and a second rim half operatively connected to the first rim half. The first rim half includes at least a first portion that is angled away from the second rim half. The second rim half includes at least a first portion that is angled away from the first rim half. A hollow cavity is formed between the first portion of the first rim half and the first portion of the second rim half.