Multipivot Flight Control Interface for Jam-Tolerant Fly-By-Wire Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fly-by-wire aircraft systems face challenges in maintaining control redundancy and resilience against single-point failures in human machine interfaces, particularly in transitioning to single-pilot operations, where mechanical linkages are susceptible to jams or impairments.

Innovation Solution

A multipivot user interface device with independently rotatable linkages and a sensing arrangement to measure orientation angles, allowing continued operation even if one linkage is jammed, by compensating with the other linkage to maintain control commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-pilot operations are implemented to reduce cockpit complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to loss of redundant control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecockpit configurationVSAvoidcontrol system redundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control stick is divided into multiple independent linkages (first linkage, second linkage, third linkage) that can operate independently. Each linkage has its own pivot points and sensing elements, allowing the system to segment the control function across multiple redundant mechanical paths while maintaining a single-pilot configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates redundant linkages and sensing arrangements before any failure occurs. The multiple linkages are designed to compensate for potential jams or impairments in individual linkages, providing beforehand cushioning against single-point failures and maintaining reliability without requiring dual-pilot operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of operation

If mechanical linkages are used for control input, then ease of operation is maintained through intuitive physical control, but reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to jams and mechanical impairments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol intuitivenessVSAvoidmechanical linkage reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different linkages are positioned and configured with specific pivot points and orientation ranges to provide localized control functions. The first linkage handles primary control inputs while the second and third linkages provide redundant control paths with different mechanical characteristics, allowing the system to maintain intuitive control while compensating for mechanical failures through differential linkage design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The redundant linkage system is designed beforehand to compensate for potential mechanical failures. If one linkage becomes jammed or impaired, the sensing arrangement detects the failure and compensates using the remaining functional linkages, providing beforehand cushioning against mechanical reliability issues while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If redundant linkages are added to maintain control reliability, then reliability is improved through fail-operational capability, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol redundancyVSAvoidlinkage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple linkages and sensing elements are merged into a single integrated control stick assembly. The first, second, and third linkages are combined with a unified sensing arrangement that processes inputs from all linkages simultaneously, allowing the system to achieve control redundancy through merging rather than through separate independent systems, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensing arrangement is designed with multi-functionality to handle inputs from multiple different linkage configurations. It can process control inputs whether one, two, or all three linkages are functional, allowing the same sensing system to serve multiple redundancy scenarios without requiring separate sensing systems for each redundancy level, thus avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4578781A1Multipivot user interface devices and related vehicle systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.02 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4578781A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4578781A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4578781A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Fly-by-wire vehicle systems and related user interface devices are provided for controlling operation of a vehicle, such as an aircraft. An exemplary user interface (200) includes a first linkage (202) and a second linkage (204) coupled to the first linkage. The first linkage is actuatable about a first pivot point (206) and the second linkage is actuatable about a second pivot point (208) independent of actuation of the first linkage about the first pivot point. The user interface includes a sensing arrangement configurable to obtain a first orientation of the first linkage with respect to a first reference orientation associated with the first pivot point, obtain a second orientation of the second linkage with respect to a second reference orientation associated with the second pivot point, and determine an input command based at least in part on the first orientation and the second orientation.