Multiple-Correlator Symbol Synchronization for Low-Power Wakeup Receivers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low power receivers face challenges in symbol synchronization due to clock shift and power consumption issues, leading to incorrect detection of incoming signals and increased power usage.

Innovation Solution

A receiver system utilizing a set of correlators that samples at a rate greater than the symbol rate, ensuring at least one correlator receives an interleaved subset of samples synchronously, reducing the likelihood of oversampling or under sampling, and generating a wakeup command when outputs satisfy a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the receiver synchronizes the sample rate with the symbol rate, then symbol detection accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymbol detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the correlation process into multiple parallel correlators, each processing a different phase offset of the same symbol. This segmentation allows the system to capture the complete symbol information across multiple parallel paths without requiring precise timing synchronization, thereby maintaining detection accuracy while operating in low-power mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses more correlators than the minimum required (excessive action) to ensure that at least one correlator captures the symbol correctly even without precise synchronization. This partial redundancy approach guarantees detection accuracy while avoiding the need for power-consuming synchronization mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Device complexity

If the receiver uses a single correlator with synchronized sampling, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of signal detection deteriorates due to clock shift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver structureVSAvoidsignal detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the detection function across multiple correlators with different phase offsets. This segmentation provides redundancy against timing errors and clock shifts, ensuring that at least one correlator will correctly detect the symbol even without precise synchronization, thereby improving reliability without adding complex synchronization circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter being optimized from timing synchronization to parallel phase sampling. Instead of adjusting timing to achieve reliable detection, the system uses multiple correlators sampling at different phases, transforming the problem from a timing-critical single-path system to a phase-diverse parallel system that is inherently more reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If the receiver samples at exactly the symbol rate, then power consumption is minimized, but the likelihood of oversampling or under sampling increases due to timing offset

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsampling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the sampling process into multiple parallel correlators that sample at the same rate but with different phase offsets. This segmentation ensures that even if timing offset causes one correlator to miss the symbol, other correlators will capture it correctly, maintaining sampling accuracy without increasing the overall sample rate and thus avoiding additional power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses more sampling instances than strictly necessary by employing multiple correlators in parallel. This excessive sampling action across different phases ensures that at least one sample will be accurate even with timing offset, while the overall power consumption remains minimal because each correlator operates at the base symbol rate rather than requiring a higher unified sampling rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4046280B1Oversampled multiple-correlator symbol synchronization
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 VIASAT INC
  • EP4046280B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4046280B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4046280B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for a wakeup receiver operation is described. A receiver may include a conversion circuit that converts an RF signal to a baseband signal, where the baseband signal comprise a set of symbols received at a symbol rate. The receiver may include an analog-to-digital converter that converts the baseband signal to samples at a sample rate greater than the symbol rate. The receiver may include a set of correlators, each correlator of the set may receive a respective subset of the samples of the baseband signal and generate a respective output. The receiver may include a compare circuit that receives the respective outputs from the set of correlators and compares the respective outputs with a threshold, where the compare circuit also generates a wakeup command based at least in part on at least one output of the respective outputs satisfying the threshold.