Multiple Material Putter with Angled Tungsten Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current golf putters struggle to achieve a combination of high moment of inertia and low center of gravity, which is difficult to attain with existing configurations and materials.

Innovation Solution

A multiple material construction with a carbon steel body, a urethane dampening layer, and a tungsten alloy rear weight, featuring an angled configuration and contrasting colors, to create a high moment of inertia and low center of gravity, with the dampening layer and rear weight affixed to the body using fasteners or permanent methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single material parent construction is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but moment of inertia and center of gravity control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmoment of inertia and center of gravity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The putter head employs a composite construction with a steel body and a tungsten rear weight attached to the rear surface. This multi-material approach allows independent optimization of each component: the steel body provides structural integrity and face flexibility, while the tungsten weight (with density approximately 1.8 times that of steel) concentrates mass at the rear to achieve the desired moment of inertia (3200-5500 g-cm²) and low center of gravity position without compromising manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If the rear weight is positioned farther from the hosel, then moment of inertia increases, but center of gravity control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoment of inertiaVSAvoidcenter of gravity control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the rear weight parameters including its position, mass (30-150 grams), and shape to achieve the desired moment of inertia while maintaining center of gravity control. The angled configuration of the rear weight relative to the putter body allows precise adjustment of mass distribution, ensuring the center of gravity remains appropriately positioned while maximizing the moment of inertia through the rearward placement of the high-density tungsten material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the putter body is made from high density material, then moment of inertia increases, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoment of inertiaVSAvoidputter weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using high-density material throughout the entire putter body, the invention applies high-density tungsten only locally at the rear weight portion where mass concentration is most effective for increasing moment of inertia. The majority of the putter body (face, sole, and hosel) remains constructed from standard steel, providing the necessary structural properties at lower cost and weight. This localized high-density material placement achieves the required moment of inertia (3200-5500 g-cm²) while keeping the overall putter weight manageable and cost-effective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9162121B2Multiple material putter
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
  • US9162121B2 patent drawing
  • US9162121B2 patent drawing
  • US9162121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf club putter having a low head center of gravity and a high MOI is disclosed herein. The putter has a metal body comprising a face and a hosel, a low density dampening layer affixed to the body, and a high density rear weight affixed to the dampening layer, and the dampening layer has a first surface that forms an angle with an opposing second surface that is inversely proportional to the distance of the hosel from a heel side of the body.