Multiplex Immune Cell Editing for Suppression-Resistant CAR Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current immunotherapeutic approaches for cancer treatment, particularly against solid tumors, are limited due to reduced tumor antigen expression, expression of inhibitory receptors, and induction of suppressive cells in the microenvironment that hinder immune response.

Innovation Solution

Multiplex editing of immune cells using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to disrupt multiple genes associated with immune suppression, such as NKG2A, CISH, and TGFBR2, and introduce heterologous proteins like CARs at specific gene loci to enhance cytotoxicity and persistence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional immunotherapeutic approaches are used, then treatment simplicity is maintained, but antitumor efficacy is limited due to inhibitory receptors and suppressive microenvironment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantitumor efficacyVSAvoidimmune cell modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the immune cell modification process into multiple targeted gene disruptions (NKG2A, CISH, TGFBR2, etc.) and heterologous protein introductions (CARs, TCRs), allowing systematic addressing of different suppressive mechanisms separately and then integrating their effects for enhanced overall antitumor efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple gene editing operations and protein introductions into a single immune cell therapy product, merging the effects of inhibitory receptor blockade, suppressive microenvironment targeting, and heterologous antigen recognition to achieve synergistic antitumor activity that exceeds individual approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple genes are disrupted simultaneously, then immune cell functionality is enhanced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune cell functionVSAvoidgene editing process ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs pre-designed guide RNAs and editing templates that are prepared in advance, allowing multiple gene disruptions to be performed in a systematic sequence. The guide RNAs are pre-synthesized and the editing machinery is pre-assembled, streamlining the manufacturing process despite the multiple targets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes CRISPR-Cas9 technology to achieve precise parameter changes in gene expression (from normal expression to complete disruption or partial knockdown), allowing controlled modification of multiple genes with high precision and reproducibility, thereby managing manufacturing complexity through standardized editing protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If heterologous proteins are introduced at genomic loci, then target specificity is improved, but risk of off-target effects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget recognition precisionVSAvoidoff-target effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces heterologous proteins (CARs, TCRs) at specific genomic loci within the immune cell genome, creating local areas of high target recognition precision. The proteins are inserted at defined locations to ensure proper expression and function while minimizing disruption to other genomic regions, thereby reducing off-target effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses guide RNAs as intermediary molecules that mediate the introduction of heterologous proteins at specific genomic loci. The guide RNAs provide sequence-specific targeting, acting as intermediaries between the editing machinery and the genomic DNA, ensuring precise localization and minimizing off-target effects through careful guide RNA design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances antitumor cytotoxicity, in vivo proliferation, and immune cell function by reducing suppressive effects, allowing immune cells to better target and eliminate tumor cells.

Implementation Method 1

Multiplex editing of immune cells using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to disrupt multiple genes associated with immune suppression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCRISPR/Cas9 gene editing:

Implementation Method 2

introduce heterologous proteins like CARs at specific gene loci to enhance cytotoxicity and persistence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) targeting:

Implementation Method 3

enhances antitumor cytotoxicity, in vivo proliferation, and immune cell function

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImmune cell proliferation:

Data Source

PatentUS12600944B2Multiplex genome editing of immune cells to enhance functionality and resistance to suppressive environment
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US12600944B2 patent drawing
  • US12600944B2 patent drawing
  • US12600944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods for producing immune cells with disruption of multiple genes. Further provided are methods for inserting a chimeric antigen receptor at a gene locus of an immune cell.