Multiplexer Grooming Optimization via Channel Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication network multiplexers are inefficiently utilized due to challenges in determining optimal data throughput and modifying network assets in response to changes in customer base, leading to high costs and operational inefficiencies in grooming processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for optimizing multiplexer configurations by determining an optimization value for each configuration, identifying the highest-ranked configuration, and employing it to optimize multiplexer utilization, which includes a multiplexer configuration access module, optimizer, service delivery point clustering, discrete event simulation, and network visualization to minimize costs and maximize efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiplexer configurations are frequently modified in response to customer base changes, then network service efficiency is improved, but operational costs (labor, planning, termination fees) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork service efficiencyVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of customer base changes and multiplexer configurations before actual reconfiguration occurs. By predicting future traffic patterns and pre-planning optimal configurations, the system minimizes reactive changes and reduces the frequency of costly reconfigurations while maintaining network efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors network traffic patterns, customer base changes, and multiplexer performance metrics. This feedback loop enables the system to identify when reconfiguration is truly necessary versus when current configurations remain optimal, thereby reducing unnecessary operational changes and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the number of multiplexers is reduced to lower costs, then operational expenses decrease, but network capacity and service quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational expensesVSAvoidnetwork capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes multiple configuration parameters simultaneously (traffic volume, channel assignments, multiplexer utilization rates, geographic distribution) to identify optimal configurations that maintain network capacity while reducing the number of active multiplexers. By changing parameters in coordinated ways rather than isolated adjustments, the system achieves cost reduction without compromising service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies opportunities to consolidate traffic from multiple multiplexers into fewer units by optimizing routing and channel assignments. Existing multiplexers are utilized more fully to handle diverse traffic types and geographic regions, making them multi-functional and reducing the need for dedicated multiplexers for specific purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If data channels are reallocated from one multiplexer to another, then multiplexer utilization efficiency is improved, but reconfiguration costs (movement costs, mileage) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiplexer utilization efficiencyVSAvoidreconfiguration costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial reconfigurations rather than complete reallocations. By making targeted adjustments to specific data channels that provide the greatest utilization improvement, versus complete reconfiguration of all channels, the system achieves efficiency gains while minimizing movement costs and operational disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10764138B2Communication network multiplexer grooming optimization
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC
  • US10764138B2 patent drawing
  • US10764138B2 patent drawing
  • US10764138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of optimized grooming of multiplexers of a communication network are presented. In an example method, an optimization value associated with each of a plurality of multiplexer configurations may be determined, wherein each of the plurality of multiplexer configurations includes a proposed assignment of each of a plurality of data channels to one of a plurality of inputs of a plurality of multiplexers. A multiplexer configuration having a highest-ranked optimization value of the plurality of multiplexer configurations may be identified and subsequently used to configure the multiplexers. Other potential aspects of the present disclosure are described in greater detail below.