Multiport DC Link Protection Using Segmented Fault Switch Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

DC microgrids face challenges with bulky and expensive solid-state circuit breakers due to low short circuit current generation capability, leading to high power losses and bidirectional current flow requirements, which are inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A multiport protection apparatus with a first DC link grid line, protection switch units, and a controller, utilizing half-controllable semiconductor switches and diodes to manage fault events, eliminating the need for full-controllable semiconductor circuit breakers, reducing semiconductor losses, cooling demand, and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If solid-state circuit breakers are used for protection, then fault protection speed is improved, but device volume and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault protection speedVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the protection function into multiple independent protection switch units, each handling a specific port. This segmentation allows the use of simpler, smaller switches rather than requiring a single large solid-state circuit breaker, thereby reducing overall device volume while maintaining fast protection capability through parallel operation of multiple units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the bidirectional current control requirement from the protection switches by using separate controllable switches for forward and reverse current paths. This allows the main protection switches to be simpler unidirectional devices, reducing their volume while still achieving comprehensive protection functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If solid-state circuit breakers are used for protection, then fault protection capability is improved, but power losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault protection capabilityVSAvoidpower losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the bidirectional current control function into separate controllable switches positioned outside the main protection path. This allows the main protection switches to operate in their optimal conduction mode with lower on-resistance, reducing power losses while maintaining full protection capability through the coordinated operation of all switch units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different switch types and control strategies to different current paths based on their specific requirements. Controllable switches are placed where bidirectional control is needed, while simpler switches handle unidirectional protection paths, optimizing the balance between protection capability and power loss for each local function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If full-controllable semiconductor switches are used, then bidirectional current control is achieved, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional current controlVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the bidirectional control function into separate controllable switches for forward and reverse paths, allowing the use of less expensive unidirectional protection switches in the main protection circuit. This segmentation achieves the required adaptability while reducing overall device cost by using cheaper components where full controllability is not necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If solid-state circuit breakers are used, then protection reliability is improved, but cooling demand increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection reliabilityVSAvoidcooling demand
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the power dissipation and heat generation into multiple separate protection switch units, each with its own thermal management requirements. This segmentation allows for more efficient heat distribution and dissipation across multiple smaller thermal zones, reducing the overall cooling demand compared to a single large solid-state circuit breaker while maintaining protection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260018877A1Multiport protection apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US20260018877A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018877A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018877A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments relate to a multiport protection apparatus comprises a first DC link grid line, a plurality of protection switch units, each protection switch unit having a control input, a plurality of ports and a controller which is coupled on its output side to the control inputs of the plurality of protection switch units. Each protection switch unit of the plurality of protection switch units couples a port of the plurality of ports to the first DC link grid line.