Multipriority Backoff Timer Control for Wireless Communication Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in managing network congestion for machine-type communication (MTC) devices, particularly in configuring backoff timers for terminals with multiple priority levels, leading to ambiguous operations and reduced system performance.

Innovation Solution

A method for user equipment (UE) configured for multipriority, where a non-access stratum (NAS) request message is transmitted without an access point name (APN) to a network node, initiating a session management (SM) backoff timer, and permitting new NAS requests not set to the first priority level while the SM backoff timer is running.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single priority level is configured for terminals, then the system operation is simple, but the system cannot effectively manage network congestion for multipriority MTC devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority management capabilityVSAvoidpriority configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the backoff timer mechanism into two distinct timers: MM backoff timer for mobility management operations and SM backoff timer for session management operations. This segmentation allows independent control of different operation types, enabling fine-grained priority management for multipriority MTC devices without requiring a complete redesign of the congestion control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic priority-based timer selection where the applicable backoff timer (MM or SM) is determined based on the priority level of the operation and current network conditions. High-priority operations can bypass certain timer restrictions while low-priority operations are subject to stricter backoff controls, creating a dynamic adaptation mechanism that responds to changing network states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If backoff timers are used to distribute network load, then network congestion is reduced, but terminal operations are restricted during timer running period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork congestion controlVSAvoidterminal operation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different backoff timer restrictions to different operation types based on their priority levels. Mobility management operations and session management operations are subject to different timer constraints (MM backoff timer vs. SM backoff timer), allowing critical operations to maintain higher flexibility while non-critical operations are more strictly controlled during congestion periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the backoff timer parameters dynamically based on operation priority and network congestion state. The timer values and applicability are adjusted according to the specific operation type and current network conditions, allowing the system to optimize between congestion control and operation flexibility by modifying timer parameters rather than using fixed restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If priority is configured per terminal with only two levels, then the configuration is simple, but the system cannot handle diverse priority requirements of multipriority MTC devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority level diversityVSAvoidpriority differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension to priority management by introducing operation-type-based timer differentiation. Instead of only increasing the number of priority levels, the system creates a two-dimensional control space: one dimension for traditional priority levels and another dimension for operation type (MM vs. SM operations). This allows multipriority devices to maintain fine-grained control without requiring an excessive number of priority levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10779142B2Method and device for controlling multipriority in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10779142B2 patent drawing
  • US10779142B2 patent drawing
  • US10779142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a backoff timer at a user equipment (UE) configured for dual priority, the method includes transmitting a non access stratum (NAS) request message without an access point name (APN) including a low priority indicator set to a first value to a network node, wherein the first NAS request message without the APN is an attach request message transmitted along with a packet data network (PDN) connectivity request without the APN; receiving a reject message for the NAS request message from the network node, and wherein a cause in the reject message is set to insufficient resources; setting the low priority indicator to a second value; and initiating a new attach procedure without the APN, while a session management (SM) backoff timer is running, wherein the first value of the low priority indicates that the UE is configured for NAS signaling low priority.