Multiprocessor Programming Toolkit for Hierarchical Cell Reuse
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing software development tools for multiprocessor arrays (MPAs) lack integration of modularity, hierarchy, and adaptable module re-use, making it difficult to manage and optimize software for varying numbers of processing elements and resource availability.
Innovation Solution
A software programming language toolkit that allows for configurable communication ports, parameter inputs, and dynamic resource allocation, enabling cell-based hierarchical design and reuse of functions on MPAs, with support for static and dynamic configuration.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If conventional software development tools are used for MPAs, then basic software execution is possible, but modularity, hierarchy, and adaptable module re-use are not integrated, making software management difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments software functionality into reusable modules that can be independently developed, configured, and deployed on MPAs. These modules represent discrete functional units that can be combined through composition operations, enabling modular design reuse while simplifying software management through structured organization.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates universal module templates that can be instantiated multiple times with different configurations across various MPA architectures. These modules serve multiple purposes through parameterization and can be adapted to different numbers of processing elements and resource configurations, providing both modularity and versatility.
2Adaptability or versatility
If software is designed for fixed MPA configurations, then implementation is simpler, but adaptability to varying numbers of processing elements and resources is lost
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic configuration capabilities where module parameters such as the number of processing elements, memory sizes, and interconnection topologies can be adjusted at instantiation time. This allows the same module template to adapt to varying MPA configurations without requiring separate implementations for each configuration scenario.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses parameterization to define module behavior in terms of configurable variables including processing element count, memory capacity, and communication bandwidth. By changing these parameters, the same module can be deployed across different MPA scales and architectures, maintaining ease of implementation while achieving configuration adaptability.
3Productivity
If manual software development methods are used for large MPAs, then detailed control is possible, but efficiency in testing, debugging, and rebuilding software decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent enables preliminary software development through module templates that encapsulate pre-tested functional units. These templates can be instantiated and composed before final deployment, allowing developers to prepare software components in advance with automated configuration, reducing the time required for testing and debugging during actual deployment cycles.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent facilitates software replication through module instantiation, where a single module template can be copied and deployed across multiple processing elements or configurations. This copying mechanism maintains consistency across deployments and enables parallel testing of multiple instances, significantly improving development efficiency for large-scale MPA software.
Data Source
AI summary
Techniques for specifying and implementing a software application targeted for execution on a multiprocessor array (MPA). The MPA may include a plurality of processing elements, supporting memory, and a high bandwidth interconnection network (IN), communicatively coupling the plurality of processing elements and supporting memory. In some embodiments, software code may specify one or more cell definitions that include: program instructions executable to perform a function and one or more language constructs. The software code may further instantiate first, second, and third cell instances, each of which is an instantiation of one of the one or more cell definitions, where the instantiation includes configuration of the one or more language constructs such that: the first and second cell instances communicate via respective communication ports and the first and second cell instances are included in the third cell instance.