Multi-radio Controller IMD Detection and Power Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Simultaneous transmissions from multiple radios in multi-radio devices often result in intermodulation distortion (IMD) signals that exceed FCC-regulated emissions limits, particularly in restricted frequency bands, due to asynchronous traffic and high transmit power levels, leading to unwanted emissions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-radio device with a controller that detects IMD signals generated by simultaneous transmissions and modulates information packets in real-time to adjust transmit power levels, abort or block transmissions, ensuring compliance with emissions limits, using a detection element to monitor and predict IMD signals and a decision element to dynamically manage packet transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If multiple radios transmit simultaneously at high power levels, then communication coverage and signal strength are improved, but intermodulation distortion signals exceed emissions limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmit power levelVSAvoidintermodulation distortion signal
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller predicts potential IMD signals before simultaneous transmissions occur by analyzing transmission requests from multiple radios. This preliminary detection allows the system to identify and mitigate harmful emissions before they are generated, preventing compliance violations while maintaining high transmit power levels when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts transmit power levels in real-time based on detected IMD conditions. When IMD signals exceed thresholds, the controller selectively reduces power for specific radios or packets; when conditions are safe, full power is maintained. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining high power for coverage and limiting power to prevent harmful emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transmit power levels are reduced to comply with emissions limits, then harmful emissions are minimized, but communication coverage and signal quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions signalVSAvoidtransmit power level
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reducing power across all transmissions, the system applies localized power adjustments to specific radios, antennas, or packet types based on their contribution to IMD. This allows compliant emissions levels to be achieved while maintaining high power for transmissions that do not generate harmful intermodulation, preserving communication quality where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If real-time monitoring and dynamic power adjustment are implemented, then emissions compliance is ensured, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions signalVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors actual transmissions and detected IMD signals, using this feedback to dynamically adjust power levels. This closed-loop system ensures compliance while automating the complexity of real-time decision-making, reducing the need for overly complex predetermined control logic while maintaining emissions control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively mitigates unwanted emissions by dynamically adjusting transmit power levels and managing packet transmissions, ensuring that IMD signals remain below predetermined limits, thereby adhering to FCC regulations and minimizing interference in restricted frequency bands.

Implementation Method 1

a detection element configured to detect a third signal generated in response to simultaneous transmission of the first and second signals... the third signal is an intermodulation distortion (IMD) signal... the third signal is generated in response to mixing a spectral power of the first signal with a spectral power of the second signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntermodulation distortion (IMD):

Data Source

PatentUS11716101B2Multi-radio device
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 NXP USA INC
  • US11716101B2 patent drawing
  • US11716101B2 patent drawing
  • US11716101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example discloses a multi-radio device, including: a controller configured to be coupled to a first radio that is configured to transmit a first signal, and a second radio that is configured to transmit a second signal; wherein the controller includes a detection element configured to detect a third signal generated in response to simultaneous transmission of the first and second signals; wherein the controller includes a decision element configured to modulate one or more information packets in the first and second signals in response to the third signal.