Multirotor Flight Control Redundancy for Sensor Failure Tolerance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multirotor aircraft control systems are prone to malfunctions due to failures in sensor technology, particularly in sensor units, which can lead to unreliable vertical take-off and landing operations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing redundancy in multirotor aircraft control units and evaluation units, with a comparator system that compares control data and provides a control command based on precise agreement or tolerance range, ensuring continued operation even with sensor unit failures, and utilizing a ranking order for comparator and control units to prioritize data accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensor units and control systems are used for vertical take-off and landing control, then flight control capability is enabled, but the system becomes prone to malfunctions and failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system reliabilityVSAvoidsensor malfunction and failure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements redundant control units and evaluation units before any malfunction occurs. Multiple control units (at least three) and evaluation units (at least two) are configured in parallel, so that if one unit fails, others can immediately take over. This beforehand cushioning ensures continuous reliable operation without interruption, directly addressing the reliability problem caused by sensor malfunctions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of control units and evaluation units with identical functionality. Each control unit has redundant counterparts that can assume its function upon failure. The evaluation units similarly operate in parallel, comparing results to ensure accuracy. This copying strategy eliminates single points of failure and maintains system reliability despite sensor or control unit malfunctions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If redundant control units and evaluation units are implemented, then system reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol command generation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into distinct functional segments: sensor units, multiple control units, evaluation units, and actuator control units. Each segment operates semi-independently with clearly defined interfaces. This segmentation allows redundancy to be implemented modularly, making the complex system more manageable and easier to diagnose, thereby reducing the practical impact of complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation units continuously monitor and compare the outputs of multiple control units in real-time. This feedback mechanism automatically detects discrepancies or failures and triggers switching to backup units without requiring complex manual intervention. The feedback loop simplifies the management of redundancy by providing automatic fault detection and correction, reducing the operational complexity despite the increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If control data from multiple units is compared with strict precision requirements, then control accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol data agreement precisionVSAvoidcontrol command processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a tolerance parameter (Agreement Tolerance) that defines the acceptable range of deviation between control data from different units. Instead of requiring exact matching, the system accepts data within this predefined tolerance, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining sufficient control accuracy. This parameter change balances precision requirements with real-time processing demands in vertical take-off and landing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11820525B2Method for controlling a multirotor aircraft for the vertical take-off and landing as well as multirotor aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 GERMANDRONES GMBH
  • US11820525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a vertical take-off and landing multirotor aircraft and a multirotor aircraft using the controller.