Multirotor Edge Computing Architecture for Flight Controller Failover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-rotor vehicles face reliability and survivability issues due to their centrally-located flight controller, which increases weight and complexity by requiring redundant control and sensor communication across multiple rotors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing distributed modular-based edge computing systems, where each rotor has an independent edge computing system capable of acquiring sensor data, executing motor commands, and communicating with other edge computing systems or remote stations, allowing for redundancy and failover mechanisms to ensure continued operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centrally-located flight controller is used with triple redundant control and sensor communication, then flight worthiness and reliability are improved, but weight and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight worthinessVSAvoidcontrol communication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized flight controller into multiple distributed edge computing systems, with each edge computing system independently controlling a specific rotor. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex centralized communication routing while maintaining triple redundancy through distributed architecture, where each edge computing system has its own sensors and actuators locally coupled to it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a centrally-located flight controller is used with triple redundant control communication, then flight worthiness is improved, but the vehicle weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight worthinessVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control architecture into distributed edge computing systems, each independently managing its own rotor with local sensors and actuators. This eliminates the need for extensive communication infrastructure and routing hardware required by centralized systems, thereby reducing overall vehicle weight while maintaining triple redundancy for flight worthiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If control forces and sensor communication are routed from a central flight controller to each actuator, then centralized control is achieved, but added weight and complexity result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidcommunication routing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control function by giving each edge computing system independent control capabilities for its associated rotor. Each edge computing system directly interfaces with its own sensors and actuators, eliminating the need for complex communication routing through a central controller. This distributed approach simplifies the communication architecture while maintaining full control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If control forces and sensor communication are routed from a central flight controller to each actuator, then centralized control is achieved, but vehicle complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements segmentation by distributing control functions to independent edge computing systems, each managing its own rotor with local sensor and actuator interfaces. This eliminates the need for extensive communication infrastructure, routing hardware, and associated weight that would be required for centralized control, while still achieving full control functionality through the distributed architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11364995B2Multi-rotor vehicle with edge computing systems
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 THE BOEING CO
  • US11364995B2 patent drawing
  • US11364995B2 patent drawing
  • US11364995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-rotor vehicle includes a plurality of electric motors and edge computing systems (ECSs). The electric motors are operatively coupled to respective rotors, and cause the respective rotors to rotate relative to the airframe. The ECSs are independent, distinct and distributed to the electric motors, each operatively coupled to a respective electric motor and thereby a respective rotor. Each ECS is configured to acquire and process sensor data for the respective rotor to determine rotor status information, and execute motor commands to control the respective electric motor and thereby the respective rotor. The ECSs are configured according to a model in which any of the ECSs is selectable as a primary ECS, and others of the ECSs are operable as secondary ECSs, the secondary ECSs configured to communicate respective rotor status information to the primary ECS, and the primary ECS configured to provide the motor commands to the secondary ECSs.