Multirotor Aircraft Forward-Swept Wing VTOL Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional VTOL multirotor aircrafts face challenges in controllability, stability, and safety due to the arrangement of thrust producing units and wings, leading to negative aerodynamic interactions, reduced structural efficiency, and safety risks such as blade loss and battery placement near passengers.

Innovation Solution

A multirotor aircraft design featuring a forward-swept wing with non-tiltably mounted thrust producing units arranged on wing tips and pods, allowing for a low-wing configuration that eliminates overhead masses, provides safe boarding zones, and distributes mass for improved structural efficiency and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If thrust producing units are arranged near the wing tips and boarding zone, then lift generation is improved, but safety is worsened due to blade loss risks and obstructive boarding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift generationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into functional zones: lift-generating thrust units are segmented and positioned at wing tips, while the boarding zone is segregated and positioned at the trailing edge, eliminating overlap between hazardous and safe areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The boarding zone is repositioned from a conventional central location to the trailing edge of the wing, utilizing the spanwise dimension to create spatial separation between thrust production areas and passenger safety zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If thrust producing units are rigidly mounted to the airframe, then structural simplicity is improved, but aerodynamic efficiency is worsened due to negative interactions between wings and thrust units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft configuration is segmented into distinct functional components: forward-swept wings for aerodynamic efficiency and separately positioned thrust producing units at wing tips for lift generation, minimizing aerodynamic interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the aircraft are optimized for different functions: the forward-swept wing section is optimized for aerodynamic performance while the wing tip section accommodates thrust units optimized for vertical lift production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If overhead masses are present above the cabin, then structural support is simplified, but crashworthiness is worsened due to increased loads during emergency landing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidcrashworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Overhead masses (thrust producing units) are extracted from their conventional position above the cabin and relocated to the wing tips, eliminating the hazard of overhead components during crash scenarios while maintaining structural support functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If thrust producing units are arranged in conventional configuration, then ease of manufacture is improved, but controllability and stability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidcontrollability and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft employs an asymmetric forward-swept wing configuration with thrust producing units positioned at the wing tips, creating an optimized mass and aerodynamic distribution that enhances controllability and stability during vertical take-off and landing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances flight stability, reduces structural loads, and ensures safe boarding and emergency exit by eliminating obstructive thrust units, improving crashworthiness, and distributing mass for balanced lift and weight distribution.

Implementation Method 1

The wings are provided for generating lift during forward flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

the thrust producing units which are provided for essentially generating lift and the other thrust producing units, both providing diverse lift/thrust compound characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic thrust: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS11691722B2Multirotor aircraft that is adapted for vertical take-off and landing
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 AIRBUS URBAN MOBILITY GMBH
  • US11691722B2 patent drawing
  • US11691722B2 patent drawing
  • US11691722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multirotor aircraft 10 that is adapted for vertical take-off and landing, comprising a fuselage, a thrust producing units assembly that is provided for producing thrust in operation, and a forward-swept wing that comprises a portside half wing and a starboard side half wing. Each one of the portside and starboard side half wings comprises an inboard section that is connected to the fuselage and an outboard section that forms a wing tip. The inboard sections of the portside and starboard side half wings form a central wing region. The portside and starboard side half wings are respectively connected in the region of their wing tips to an associated outboard wing pod that supports at least two non-tiltably mounted thrust producing units of the thrust producing units assembly.