Multi-scale mesh modeling for real-time additive manufacturing control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing processes, such as metal laser sintering and electron beam melting, are difficult to model and control due to the need for extremely fine-scale finite element meshes and high computational time, leading to impractical simulation times with current methods.

Innovation Solution

The development of a multi-scale modeling approach that decouples coarse and fine meshes, allowing the fine mesh to move within the coarse mesh with a cut and paste operation, and uses adaptive mesh refinement strategies with intelligent stiffness matrix formulation for faster solution of thermo-mechanical problems, enabling real-time simulation and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If uniform fine-scale mesh is used to capture solidification physics around melt pool, then measurement precision is improved, but computational time increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of solidification physics captureVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The domain is segmented into multiple regions with different mesh resolutions: fine mesh in the melt pool region to capture solidification physics accurately, and coarse mesh in the bulk region to reduce computational cost. This multi-region segmentation allows selective application of computational resources where they are most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different mesh qualities are applied to different spatial locations: high-resolution fine mesh is used locally in the melt pool region where accurate solidification physics capture is critical, while lower-resolution coarse mesh is used in the bulk region where detailed resolution is less critical. This local quality differentiation maintains accuracy where needed while reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If uniform fine mesh is used throughout the domain, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of part characteristicsVSAvoidmesh element quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computational domain is divided into multiple subdomains with different mesh densities. The melt pool region uses fine mesh for accurate solidification capture, while the bulk region uses coarse mesh. This segmentation reduces the total number of elements from over 10^12 to a manageable size while maintaining prediction accuracy for critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The problem is transformed from a uniform 3D fine mesh approach to a multi-resolution 3D mesh approach with spatially varying element sizes. This dimensional differentiation in mesh resolution allows accurate capture of localized physics without requiring fine mesh throughout the entire domain, significantly reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If small time step is used to capture moving heat source physics, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of heat source physics captureVSAvoidsimulation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The temporal domain is segmented into different time step regimes: small time steps are used during active laser heating to accurately capture rapid thermal changes and solidification physics, while larger time steps are used during cooling phases where changes are slower. This temporal segmentation maintains measurement precision during critical phases while improving overall simulation productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If traditional fine-gridded static meshing is used, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of manufacture worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysics capture accuracyVSAvoidmodeling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mesh is transformed from a static uniform fine mesh to a dynamic adaptive mesh that automatically adjusts resolution based on physical conditions. The fine mesh region moves with the melt pool, and the mesh is refined only where needed. This dynamic approach maintains measurement precision while dramatically simplifying the modeling process compared to manual fine-gridded meshing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mesh refinement strategy is made self-adaptive, automatically identifying regions requiring fine resolution based on physical criteria (melt pool location, thermal gradients) without requiring manual intervention. The system self-adjusts the mesh configuration to maintain accuracy while reducing overall complexity, making the process easier to manufacture and implement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10664560B2Multi-scale mesh modeling software products and controllers
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US10664560B2 patent drawing
  • US10664560B2 patent drawing
  • US10664560B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Simulation systems, manufacturing systems, software products and controllers are provided with multi-scale modeling in which a coarse mesh and a fine mesh that models a stimulus are decoupled. The fine mesh can be moved within the coarse mesh with a cut and paste operation. The coarse mesh is updated by sparsely propagated effects through the coarse mesh. Simulations of the invention can be conducted in real-time, and be used as controllers in manufacturing systems, such as additive manufacturing systems. A number of efficient methods are provided for solving meshing determinations that arise from movement of a stimulus modeled within a fine mesh.