Multispar Lifting Surface Corner Reinforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multispar torsion box structures, transferring axial loads without additional internal structures is challenging due to the closed cell configuration, which limits access and requires reinforcement, increasing weight, cost, and assembly complexity.

Innovation Solution

The multispar lifting surface incorporates corner reinforcements with increased thickness in the open and closed cells, and an axial rod fitting with a L-shaped cross-section that directly engages the rear spar and surfaces, allowing load transfer without internal fittings, using a longitudinal profile and lug for secure attachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If additional internal structures (counter fittings) are installed inside the torsion box to transfer axial loads, then load transfer capability is improved, but device complexity and assembly operations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the load transfer function from the interior of the closed cells and relocates it to the exterior corner reinforcements. By removing the need for internal counter fittings and placing reinforcement elements at the accessible corner regions, the solution eliminates internal structural complexity while maintaining load transfer capability through the axial rod fitting and reinforced corners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The axial rod fitting acts as an intermediary element that bridges the movable control surface to the reinforced corners of the torsion box. This fitting distributes axial loads from the hinge arms through the axial rod to the corner reinforcements, eliminating the need for direct internal counter fittings while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If additional internal structures are installed to transfer axial loads, then load transfer capability is improved, but assembly operations and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidassembly operations
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex internal assembly operations required for installing counter fittings inside closed cells. By relocating the load transfer function to exterior corner reinforcements that can be accessed and installed from the outside, the assembly process is simplified and cost-reduced while maintaining load transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If cutting is made in the closed cell structure to access interior for reinforcement, then load transfer capability is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates and assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the reinforcement function from the interior of closed cells to the exterior corner regions. By placing reinforcement elements at accessible corner locations rather than attempting to reinforce internal cell structures, the solution avoids cutting into closed cells, thereby preserving structural integrity and eliminating the need for complex internal access operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If corner reinforcements with increased thickness are used, then load transfer capability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidtorsion box weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement only at the specific corner regions where axial loads are transferred, rather than uniformly thickening the entire torsion box structure. The corner reinforcements are strategically positioned at the intersection points where the axial rod connects to the spar and surface, providing localized strength enhancement with minimal weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4005919B1Multispar lifting surface
Publication Date: 2023.10.18 AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL
  • EP4005919B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4005919B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4005919B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A multispar lifting surface (30) comprising a multispar torsion box (32) having corner reinforcements (25), a movable control surface, and an axial rod fitting (40). The movable control surface comprises a movable element (1), a hinged connection (6.1) joined to the movable element (1), and an axial rod (7) joining the hinged connection (6.1) to the rear spar (5) of the multispar torsion box (32).The axial rod fitting (40) is configured to join the axial rod (7) and the multispar torsion box (32); and comprises a longitudinal profile (10) resting against the rear spar (5), and a lug (20) joined to the longitudinal profile (10) at one end and to the axial rod (7) at another end; the lug (20) defining a plane comprising the longitudinal axis of the axial rod (7). This multispar lifting surface (30) is able to support sideward forces without any additional structure.