Multi-Stage Compressor Control Using Interstage Pressure Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial compressed air supply systems with multiple multi-stage electric centrifugal compressors face high energy costs due to inefficient operation, necessitating the need for improved control methods to minimize energy use.

Innovation Solution

A controller is employed to optimize the operation of multi-stage compressors by determining optimal interstage pressures and compressor speeds to minimize power consumption while meeting demand, using proportional-integral-derivative control and considering compressor maps and motor efficiencies, and switching between filling and maintenance states to maintain tank pressure within limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple multi-stage electric centrifugal compressors are used to meet compressed air demand, then the compressed air supply capacity is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressed air supply capacityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters including interstage pressures, compressor speeds, and valve positions to optimize energy consumption. The controller continuously modifies these parameters based on real-time demand conditions to minimize power usage while maintaining required compressed air supply capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system enables dynamic operation of multiple compressors with adjustable speeds and configurations. Compressors can be switched between different operational states (on/off, speed adjustments) and reconfigured in series or parallel arrangements based on real-time energy optimization calculations, allowing the system to adapt to varying demand conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If compressors operate at high capacity to meet peak demand, then the compressed air availability is improved, but the energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressed air availabilityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple compressors operating at partial capacity rather than a single compressor at full capacity. By distributing the compression load across multiple units and operating them at optimal partial loads, the system maintains high compressed air availability while avoiding the energy inefficiency associated with single-compressor full-load operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The compressed air generation task is segmented across multiple independent compressor units. Each compressor can be controlled and optimized separately, allowing the system to select the most energy-efficient combination of compressors to meet the current demand, thereby improving overall energy efficiency while maintaining availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Use of energy by moving object

If compressors are frequently switched on and off to match demand, then the energy consumption is reduced, but the system reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic speed control and gradual load adjustment rather than abrupt on/off switching. Compressors can transition smoothly between operational states and maintain stable operation over extended periods, reducing mechanical stress and improving reliability while still achieving energy optimization through controlled operational adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Use of energy by moving object

If complex control algorithms are implemented to optimize energy use, then the energy consumption is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from sensors monitoring pressure, flow, and power consumption to continuously adjust compressor operation. This feedback mechanism enables automated energy optimization without requiring overly complex control algorithms, as the system naturally adapts to changing conditions through real-time monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically optimizes energy consumption without requiring external intervention or complex manual configuration. The controllers on each compressor and the central controller work autonomously to determine optimal operating points, reducing the need for complex external control infrastructure while achieving energy reduction goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The controller effectively reduces energy consumption and operational costs by optimizing compressor operation, ensuring efficient delivery of compressed air while adhering to safety and efficiency boundaries.

Implementation Method 1

calculating a target interstage pressure for gas fed from the first outlet to the second inlet by minimizing a sum of power used by the first compressor to obtain a first pressure ratio of ambient pressure to target interstage pressure at the requested mass flow, and power used by the second compressor to obtain a second pressure ratio of target interstage pressure to tank pressure at the requested mass flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPower minimization through pressure ratio optimization:

Implementation Method 2

The first and second compressors are centrifugal compressors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal compression: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

a first compressor having a first inlet, a first outlet, a first impeller, and a first motor coupled to the first impeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpeller compression: Impeller

Data Source

PatentUS12535075B2Multi-stage electric compressor energy consumption optimization
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 GARRETT TRANSPORTATION I INC
  • US12535075B2 patent drawing
  • US12535075B2 patent drawing
  • US12535075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compressed gas delivery systems and controllers. A multi-stage compressor system operation with series compressors is optimized by a controller by using inter-stage pressure as a control parameter for optimization to provide reduced power consumption. A multi-compressor system with parallel compressors is controlled using optimized operation parameters for each of several parallel compressors to provide reduced power consumption.