Multistage Hydroprocessing Configuration for High Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydroprocessing methods for heavy hydrocarbon materials boiling in the vacuum gas oil range face challenges in achieving high selectivity and conversion efficiency while maintaining low capital investment, particularly in upgrading external distillates and managing recycle liquids, which often result in higher costs and complications.

Innovation Solution

A multistage hydroprocessing configuration involving a once-through liquid unit with two reactors, a high-pressure separator, and split feed injection, operating at lower pressures and optimized reaction zones to minimize overcracking and catalyst volume, allowing for high conversion and selectivity of distillates without separate fractionation zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multistage recycle is used to achieve high conversion and selectivity, then liquid yield and flexibility are improved, but capital investment and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid yieldVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process divides the hydroprocessing into two distinct reaction zones: a first reactor for hydrotreating VGO at high pressure, and a second reactor for hydrocracking the bottoms fraction at lower pressure. This segmentation allows each reactor to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high conversion and selectivity without requiring complex multistage recycle systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process extracts the distillate fraction overhead from the first reactor and directs it to a distillate upgrader, preventing it from entering the second reactor. This extraction of the valuable distillate stream early in the process eliminates overcracking and allows the second reactor to focus on converting bottoms to additional distillates, achieving high overall yield without complex recycle operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If single stage once through design is used to reduce capital cost, then equipment investment is reduced, but conversion efficiency and selectivity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapital investmentVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses two separate reactors in series, with the first dedicated to hydrotreating and the second to hydrocracking. This segmentation enables high conversion efficiency comparable to multistage systems while maintaining simpler equipment requirements and lower capital investment than true multistage recycle units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each reactor operates under locally optimized conditions: the first reactor operates at high pressure (1500-3000 psig) for effective hydrotreating, while the second reactor operates at lower pressure (500-2000 psig) for efficient hydrocracking. This local optimization of operating conditions maximizes conversion efficiency in each zone while keeping overall system complexity low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If high pressure is maintained throughout the process to ensure effective hydrotreating, then hydrotreating efficiency is improved, but overcracking of distillates increases and hydrogen consumption rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrotreating efficiencyVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The process applies high pressure locally only in the first reactor where hydrotreating is required, and reduces pressure in the second reactor where hydrocracking occurs. This localized pressure optimization ensures effective hydrotreating while minimizing overcracking and hydrogen consumption in the downstream hydrocracking section

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By extracting the distillate fraction overhead from the first reactor and directing it to a distillate upgrader, the process removes these lighter fractions before they can undergo unwanted overcracking reactions in the second reactor, thereby reducing hydrogen consumption and improving distillate selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If separate fractionation zones are used to upgrade external distillates, then upgrading capability is improved, but process complexity and equipment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupgrading capabilityVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process merges the upgrading of external distillates with the hydrocracking of VGO bottoms by feeding both streams to the second reactor. This integration allows simultaneous upgrading of multiple feedstocks in a single reactor, eliminating the need for separate fractionation zones and reducing overall process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The second reactor serves multiple functions: it hydrocracks the bottoms from the first reactor, upgrades external distillate feeds, and produces additional middle distillate products. This multi-functionality achieves versatile upgrading capability without requiring separate dedicated units for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves high conversion and selectivity comparable to multistage recycle units at lower capital costs, minimizing overcracking and hydrogen consumption, and effectively upgrades external distillates, producing high yields of middle distillates with reduced equipment needs and operational complexity.

Implementation Method 1

passing the effluent of step (b), following pressure reduction, to a very hot separator maintained at high pressure, where it is separated into an overhead fraction and a bottoms fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 2

contacting it with hydroprocessing catalyst, thereby creating a hydroprocessed effluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

combining the upgraded effluent of step (d) with the second hydroprocessed effluent of step (e), the combined stream then entering a hot separator maintained at high pressure, in which the combined stream is separated into an overhead fraction and a bottoms fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal separation: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS7531082B2High conversion hydroprocessing using multiple pressure and reaction zones
Publication Date: 2009.05.12 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US7531082B2 patent drawing
  • US7531082B2 patent drawing
  • US7531082B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the refining of crude oil, hydroprocessing units such as hydrotreaters and hydrocrackers are used to remove impurities such as sulfur, nitrogen, and metals from the crude oil. They are also used to convert the feed into valuable products such as naphtha, jet fuel, kerosene and diesel. The current invention provides very high to total conversion of heavy oils to products in a single high-pressure loop, using multiple reaction stages. A hot high pressure separator is located between the first and second reaction stages. Overhead from the separator is treated in a distillate upgrader, which may operate in co-current or countercurrent mode.