Multistage Naphtha Reforming with Interstage Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current naphtha reforming processes face challenges in achieving high liquid yield, improving hydrogen production, and minimizing the formation of less valuable low-molecule-weight products, despite advances in catalysts and processes.

Innovation Solution

A multistage reforming process involving interstage separation, where a naphtha boiling range feedstock is processed in a penultimate stage at a first pressure with a first catalyst, then separated into intermediate and heavy reformates, with the intermediate reformate being further processed in a final stage at a lower pressure with a second catalyst to enhance Research Octane Number (RON) and aromatics content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional single-stage reforming is used, then the process is simple, but liquid yield and hydrogen production are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid yieldVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reforming process is divided into multiple stages with interstage separation. The feedstock is reformed in a first stage, then separated into light and heavy fractions, with the light fraction undergoing further reforming in a second stage. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage for specific functions, improving overall liquid yield and hydrogen production while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If severe reforming conditions are applied, then octane number increases, but hydrocracking and dealkylation increase reducing liquid yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoctane numberVSAvoidliquid yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the reforming process into stages with interstage fractionation, the process can apply moderate conditions in the first stage to preserve liquid yield, then apply more severe conditions in the second stage to the light fraction to maximize octane number. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing the severity across stages rather than applying it all at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different reforming conditions are applied to different fractions at different stages. The light fraction (C6-C8) receives more severe reforming in the second stage to maximize octane, while the heavy fraction is processed under milder conditions to preserve liquid yield. This local quality approach optimizes both octane number and liquid yield simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If interstage separation is implemented, then liquid yield and hydrogen production improve, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidnumber of process steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into distinct reforming and separation stages, allowing each unit operation to be optimized independently. The interstage separation step is integrated as a modular component between reforming stages, enabling improved hydrogen production and liquid yield while managing overall process complexity through systematic organization of process steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If dealkylation and hydrocracking are promoted, then lighter products are formed, but value decreases due to low molecular weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight hydrocarbon productsVSAvoidproduct value
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process performs preliminary reforming in the first stage to prepare the feedstock, then separates fractions before applying further reforming to the light fraction in the second stage. This preliminary action sequence allows selective processing that minimizes unwanted dealkylation and hydrocracking of valuable heavy fractions while still producing sufficient light products, thereby maintaining product value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in improved RON, increased C5+ liquid yield, and enhanced hydrogen production while minimizing unwanted hydrocracking and dealkylation reactions, thereby producing a high octane product with improved catalyst life.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a naphtha boiling range feedstock in a penultimate stage of a multi-stage reforming process at a first reforming pressure with a first reforming catalyst to produce a penultimate effluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

separating at least a portion of the penultimate effluent into at least an intermediate reformate comprising at least 70 vol % C5-C8 hydrocarbons and a heavy reformate comprising at least 70 vol % C9+ hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Fractionation

Implementation Method 3

contacting the intermediate reformate in a final stage of the multi-stage reforming process at a second reforming pressure with a second reforming catalyst to produce a final effluent comprising a final reformate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS8882992B2Multi-stage reforming process to produce high octane gasoline
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US8882992B2 patent drawing
  • US8882992B2 patent drawing
  • US8882992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a multistage reforming process to produce a high octane product. A naphtha boiling range feedstock is processed in a multi-stage reforming process, in which the process involves at least 1) a penultimate stage for reforming the naphtha feedstock to produce a penultimate effluent 2) a final stage for further reforming at least a portion of the penultimate effluent 3) a regeneration step for the final stage catalyst. The severity of the penultimate stage can be increased during final stage catalyst regeneration in order to maintain the target RON of the reformate product and avoid reactor downtime.