Multistage Superplastic Forming Apparatus Reducing Cycle Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional superplastic forming processes require long cycle times, leading to necking and splitting when forming complex components with small radii, and often necessitate additional costly equipment and pre-forming steps to address these issues.

Innovation Solution

A multistage superplastic forming apparatus and method using a single-action forming tool with non-planar upper and lower dies that combines mechanical and gas forming processes, eliminating the need for a blank holder by pre-forming the metal sheet in multiple axes before the final superplastic forming step.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional superplastic forming process is used to form complex components with small radii, then the component geometry can be achieved, but the forming cycle time becomes excessively long (up to 30 minutes)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex component geometryVSAvoidforming cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The forming process is divided into multiple stages: an initial mechanical pre-forming stage followed by a superplastic forming stage. This segmentation allows the most time-critical material redistribution to occur mechanically at high speed, while the slower superplastic process only needs to complete the final complex geometry, thereby reducing total cycle time while maintaining formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical pre-forming process performs preliminary material redistribution and thinning operations before the superplastic forming stage. By preparing the blank in advance with appropriate material flow patterns, the subsequent superplastic forming requires less time to achieve the final complex geometry, thus reducing overall cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the forming cycle time is reduced to increase productivity, then productivity improves, but necking and splitting occur when forming over small radii

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming rateVSAvoidmaterial integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The process separates material redistribution (handled mechanically to prevent necking) from final forming (handled by superplastic process). This allows faster overall cycling while maintaining material integrity during the critical thinning zones through controlled mechanical pre-forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical pre-forming process performs preliminary material flow control to prevent necking and splitting before the superplastic forming begins. By establishing appropriate material distribution patterns in advance, the subsequent rapid superplastic forming can proceed without causing material failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If additional pre-forming steps are added to prevent necking and excessive thinning, then material integrity is maintained, but equipment complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial thickness uniformityVSAvoidforming equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the mechanical pre-forming and superplastic forming operations into a single integrated tool and process sequence. The same tooling performs both functions in sequence, eliminating the need for separate pre-forming equipment and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining material integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The forming tool is designed to perform multiple functions: mechanical pre-forming and superplastic forming. This multi-functional tooling eliminates the need for dedicated separate equipment for each operation, reducing manufacturing cost and equipment complexity while ensuring material integrity through controlled pre-forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces cycle times, minimizes necking and excessive thinning, simplifies equipment, and decreases overall forming time while maintaining material thickness, thereby improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of forming complex geometries.

Implementation Method 1

Superplastic forming (SPF) is a process that takes advantage of a material's superplasticity or ability to undergo large strains under certain elevated temperature conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperplasticity: Superplasticity

Implementation Method 2

a predefined gas pressure profile is applied to one side of the sheet. The gas pressure forces the sheet into a die cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The die and sheet of material, or as sometimes referred to the blank, are heated to a superplastic temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS7827840B2Multistage superplastic forming apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2010.11.09 FORD MOTOR CO
  • US7827840B2 patent drawing
  • US7827840B2 patent drawing
  • US7827840B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A superplastic forming apparatus and method for forming a sheet of material at an elevated temperatures into a workpiece having a complex geometry. The process takes advantage of a mechanical forming step, which draws material along a major axis to form a first preform. Upon completion of the first mechanical forming step, a second, initial superplastic forming step acts on the first preform to create a second preform having a plurality of channels or grooves located thereon. The grooves or channels function to draw additional material prior to the second or final gas forming step, which completes the forming process by driving the material against a forming surface. Accordingly, the method and apparatus function to reduce forming time and eliminate thinning and wrinkling of the sheet material during the forming process.