Power optimization for a multistage stack of thermoelectric cooling devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complexity in controlling multiple Thermoelectric Coolers (TECs) in multistage setups leads to difficulties in determining optimal control parameters for maximal energy efficiency, due to varying ambient temperatures, thermal loads, and component performance changes over time.

Innovation Solution

A control system that optimizes power consumption by iteratively adjusting the power supplied to each TEC in the stack, using feedback from calibrated temperature sensors and employing communication protocols to manage power distribution across multiple TECs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If multiple TECs are controlled in a multistage setup, then the desired temperature can be maintained, but the complexity of control increases making it difficult to determine optimal control parameters for maximal energy efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesired temperatureVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the temperature control task by dividing the TEC stack into multiple independently controllable stages, each with its own control parameters. This allows the complex multistage control problem to be broken down into simpler individual stage controls while maintaining overall temperature management capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring temperature differentials across each TEC stage and adjusting control parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and determine optimal control parameters dynamically, resolving the complexity issue through iterative optimization rather than fixed complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If control parameters are optimized for maximal energy efficiency, then power consumption is minimized, but the system cannot adapt to changing ambient temperatures and thermal loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static control parameters to dynamic control parameters that adapt in real-time to changing ambient temperatures and thermal loads. By making the control system dynamic and responsive to environmental changes, the system maintains energy efficiency while gaining adaptability to varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism continuously monitors operating conditions and adjusts control parameters to maintain optimal energy efficiency across different ambient temperatures and thermal loads. This closed-loop control enables the system to adapt to changing conditions while minimizing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If design predictions are made based on datasheet specifications, then the initial system configuration can be established, but accuracy decreases over time as components age and deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial system configurationVSAvoidprediction accuracy over time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses datasheet specifications to establish an initial control parameter configuration before operation begins. This preliminary action provides a starting point for control that is easy to determine from manufacturer data, while subsequent operational feedback refines these parameters to maintain accuracy as components age.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback control system continuously monitors actual performance and adjusts control parameters to compensate for component aging and deterioration. This ongoing calibration maintains prediction accuracy over time, overcoming the limitation of static design predictions based solely on initial datasheet specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively minimizes overall power consumption while maintaining a desired temperature differential across the TEC stack, adapting to changes in external conditions and component performance.

Implementation Method 1

Power optimization for a multistage stack of thermoelectric cooling devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPeltier Effect: Peltier Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12314112B2Power optimization for a multistage stack of thermoelectric cooling devices
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 UNIVERSITY OF MALTA
  • US12314112B2 patent drawing
  • US12314112B2 patent drawing
  • US12314112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems and systems provide for temperature control between thermoelectric coolers (TECs or TEMs) in a stack of multiple TECs, by optimizing the power suppled to each TEC in the stack. The temperatures may be continuously monitored, to continuously provide for the aforementioned power optimization.