Multistate Switch Unit Circuit for Power Factor Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power factor correction converters in communications power supplies suffer from low conversion efficiency and power density due to high inductance ripple current and large size, especially with interleaving technology and bidirectional switch bridgeless PFC circuits.

Innovation Solution

A power factor correction converter design incorporating multiple groups of bidirectional switches, an autotransformer, and a boost inductor forms a multistate switch unit circuit, allowing for reduced ripple and inductance, with the boost inductor being charged and discharged multiple times in a switching period, thereby improving efficiency and density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If interleaving technology and bidirectional switch bridgeless PFC is used, then power factor correction is achieved, but inductance ripple current is high and conversion efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidinductance ripple current
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single boost inductor into multiple interleaved inductors (L1, L2, L3, L4), each operating at different phases. This segmentation reduces the ripple current from each individual inductor while maintaining the overall power factor correction function, directly addressing the high inductance ripple current problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple bidirectional switch groups (S1-S2, S3-S4, S5-S6, S7-S8) with their respective inductors to work together in an interleaved configuration. This merging of multiple PFC circuits operating in parallel achieves reduced ripple current and improved conversion efficiency compared to a single PFC circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Power

If interleaving technology is used, then power factor correction is achieved, but device size is large and power density is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the single large inductor into multiple smaller interleaved inductors, the patent reduces the volume required for each individual inductor component. The distributed configuration allows for more compact magnetic core design and better thermal management, improving power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes multiple phases and time domains through interleaved operation, effectively adding a temporal dimension to the power processing. This allows the system to achieve the same power handling capability with smaller individual components by distributing the load across multiple time-phased channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If bidirectional switch bridgeless PFC is used, then circuit complexity is reduced, but effective value of current through switching transistor is great

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit complexityVSAvoidcurrent through switching transistor
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the total current handling among multiple bidirectional switch groups (S1-S2, S3-S4, S5-S6, S7-S8), each managing a portion of the total power. This segmentation reduces the current magnitude through each individual switching transistor while maintaining the overall bridgeless PFC functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple lower-current switch groups to achieve the same total current handling capability as a single high-current switch group would provide. This approach reduces stress on individual transistors while maintaining circuit simplicity through the bridgeless topology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces ripple currents and inductance, enhancing conversion efficiency and power density, and allows for a more compact circuit while maintaining better power factor and harmonic distortion indexes.

Implementation Method 1

an autotransformer, a boost inductor... A front end of each group of bidirectional switches is correspondingly connected to a coil of the autotransformer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a boost inductor... the boost inductor is charged twice and discharged twice in one switching period

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field accumulation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

a bus filter capacitor... Two ends of the load are connected to two ends of the bus filter capacitor, respectively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS8531854B2Power factor correction converter and power factor correction conversion device
Publication Date: 2013.09.10 HUAWEI DIGITAL POWER TECH CO LTD
  • US8531854B2 patent drawing
  • US8531854B2 patent drawing
  • US8531854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power factor correction converter and a power factor correction conversion device, includes two groups of bidirectional switches, an autotransformer, a boost inductor, a bus filter capacitor, two front bridge arms; and a rear bridge arm; the front end of each group of bidirectional switches are connected to a coil of the autotransformer in one-to-one correspondence, and a rear end of each group of bidirectional switches is connected to one end of an AC input power grid; a central tap of the autotransformer is connected to an output end of the boost inductor, and an input end of the boost inductor is connected to the other end of the AC input power grid; a front end of each group of bidirectional switches is connected to a front bridge arm, and a rear end is connected to the rear bridge arm.