Multistatic Underwater Acoustic Detection System with Blind Zone Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current acoustic detection systems for underwater infrastructure face challenges in detecting fast-moving threats at sufficient distances due to absorption losses at high frequencies, leading to reduced detection ranges and reaction times, especially for divers and other submerged targets.

Innovation Solution

An acoustic detection system utilizing multistatic detection groups with submerged transmitters operating at low frequencies and multiple receivers arranged in specific configurations to create overlapping detection areas, covering blind zones and optimizing receiver placement for improved detection range and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-frequency monostatic sonars are used to detect underwater threats, then detection precision is improved, but detection range is reduced due to absorption losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection function into separate transmitter and receiver components, with multiple receivers distributed in space. Each receiver independently processes signals, allowing the system to maintain high-frequency precision while extending detection range through spatial distribution of detection elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces low-frequency transmitters as intermediaries that illuminate targets without directly detecting them. These transmitters operate at frequencies with lower absorption losses, enabling long-range illumination while high-frequency receivers maintain precise detection capabilities, thus resolving the contradiction between range and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If transmitters are placed close to receivers to form monostatic sonars, then system complexity is reduced, but detection range is limited by transmitter disruption of neighboring receivers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sonar function into separate transmitter and receiver units. Transmitters operate at low frequencies for long-range illumination while receivers operate at high frequencies for precise detection. This segmentation allows transmitters and receivers to be spatially separated, avoiding mutual disruption while maintaining detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from collocated monostatic transmitters-receivers to distributed multistatic configurations in three-dimensional space. Receivers are positioned at multiple locations relative to transmitters, creating multiple bistatic detection paths that extend the effective detection volume and range without requiring complex collocated assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If transmission rate is increased to improve information flow about threats, then productivity is improved, but detection range is reduced due to band allocation constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation flow rateVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Low-frequency transmitters serve as intermediaries that operate in a frequency band with lower absorption losses, enabling long-range signal propagation. High-frequency receivers process the reflected signals with high precision. This intermediary approach allows high transmission rates for threat information while maintaining extended detection range through the low-frequency illumination path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances detection capabilities for various threats, including fast-moving divers and underwater vehicles, by increasing detection ranges and providing sufficient reaction time for preventive actions, achieving up to 5-10 times the range of conventional systems and enabling continuous detection of fast threats.

Implementation Method 1

acoustic detection system for detecting various threatening targets, penetrating into a sensitive area defined with respect to an infrastructure to be protected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic detection: Sound

Implementation Method 2

A submerged transmitter transmitting at low frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow frequency transmission: Sound

Implementation Method 3

A plurality of submerged receivers comprising at least two receivers, each receiver of a given group forming, with the transmitter of the group, a bistatic pair

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic echo detection: Echo

Implementation Method 4

each bistatic pair generating an elementary detection area surrounding a blind zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBistatic detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11796674B2Modular distributed system for the acoustic detection of underwater threats in a sensitive zone
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 THALES SA
  • US11796674B2 patent drawing
  • US11796674B2 patent drawing
  • US11796674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic detection system for detecting at least partly submerged targets in a sensitive area defined with respect to an infrastructure, wherein the system includes at least one multistatic detection group, each multistatic detection group defining a detection area, and comprising: a submerged transmitter transmitting at low frequencies; a plurality of submerged receivers comprising at least two receivers, each receiver of a given group forming, with the transmitter of the group, a bistatic pair, each bistatic pair generating an elementary detection area surrounding a blind zone, the detection area of the group being formed by all of the elementary detection areas of the receivers of the group, the blind zone of each receiver in a given detection group being at least partly covered by the elementary detection areas of the neighbouring receivers of the detection system.