Predictive Multi-Station Process Control for In-Spec Manufacturing Output

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing process control systems are limited in dynamically adjusting inputs across multiple stations to optimize final outputs, leading to variability and inefficiency in producing in-specification products, as they rely on static algorithms and fail to consider trends across multiple stations.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning controller utilizing machine-learning models to predict and adjust control inputs across multiple stations, identifying key influencers and optimizing the manufacturing process to ensure in-specification final outputs by dynamically controlling station operations based on real-time data and feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional static algorithms are used for process control, then system simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision and adaptability deteriorate due to inability to dynamically adjust to varying conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput specification complianceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional static control algorithms with a deep learning-based predictive process control system. The DNN controller learns optimal control strategies from historical data and dynamically adjusts control inputs to maintain output specifications, substituting rigid mechanical control logic with adaptive intelligent control that improves manufacturing precision without requiring complex hardware modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes control parameters based on predicted process outcomes. The DNN controller continuously adjusts control inputs (parameters) to compensate for variations in process conditions, material properties, and environmental factors, thereby maintaining output specification compliance while adapting to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If deep learning models are deployed for predictive control, then manufacturing precision and adaptability improve, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training of the deep learning model using historical process data before deployment. This preliminary action allows the DNN to learn optimal control strategies in advance, so that during actual operation, the controller can quickly adapt to new conditions without requiring complex real-time computation, thereby improving adaptability while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the DNN controller and the physical process stations. This intermediary layer handles data preprocessing, feature extraction, and control signal generation, which simplifies the overall system architecture by separating the complex intelligence functions from the physical control implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If real-time predictive control is implemented, then productivity and quality improve, but loss of time for data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput quality and consistencyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects and processes historical process data in advance to train the deep learning model. This preliminary data preparation allows the model to be pre-trained with comprehensive patterns and relationships, so that during real-time operation, predictions can be made quickly using the already-learned knowledge, reducing real-time data processing time while maintaining high output quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The DNN controller focuses on predicting and controlling only the critical process parameters that have the most significant impact on output quality. By concentrating computational resources on the most influential variables rather than processing all possible data, the system achieves high productivity with reduced data processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11156991B2Predictive process control for a manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 NANOTRONICS IMAGING INC
  • US11156991B2 patent drawing
  • US11156991B2 patent drawing
  • US11156991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosed technology encompass the use of a deep learning controller for monitoring and improving a manufacturing process. In some aspects, a method of the disclosed technology includes steps for: receiving a plurality of control values from two or more stations, at a deep learning controller, wherein the control values are generated at the two or more stations deployed in a manufacturing process, predicting an expected value for an intermediate or final output of an article of manufacture, based on the control values, and determining if the predicted expected value for the article of manufacture is in-specification. In some aspects, the process can further include steps for generating control inputs if the predicted expected value for the article of manufacture is not in-specification. Systems and computer-readable media are also provided.