Multi-Step Image Subtraction for Semiconductor Defect Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As semiconductor feature sizes shrink, defect inspection systems face challenges with weak measurable signals and lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) due to noise from previous process steps, limiting accuracy and reliability in defect detection.

Innovation Solution

The system generates a multi-step difference image by weighted subtraction of images from current and previous process steps, using a controller to identify defects by isolating noise from previous layers, thereby improving SNR and detection sensitivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If feature sizes are shrunk to continue scaling, then device performance is improved, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates due to weaker defect signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes noise components from previous process steps by performing subtraction of images from previous steps from current step images. This isolates the defect signals from the overwhelming background noise, enabling detection of defects even as feature sizes shrink and signals weaken.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary noise characterization by capturing and processing images from previous process steps before the actual defect inspection. By pre-identifying and subtracting noise patterns from earlier steps, the system prepares a cleaned reference for subsequent defect detection, improving sensitivity to weak signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If noise from previous process steps is included in inspection, then inspection coverage is maintained, but noise level increases reducing detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively extracts and removes noise components from previous process steps by performing image subtraction. This maintains the beneficial coverage of inspecting multiple steps while eliminating the harmful noise that reduces detection accuracy, allowing defects to be clearly identified against a cleaned background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful noise from previous process steps into a useful reference by capturing, analyzing, and subtracting these noise patterns. The previously harmful noise becomes a subtracted reference that enhances defect detection, transforming the problem of noise into a solution for improved signal clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If multiple images from current and previous steps are processed, then noise reduction is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing into distinct, manageable steps: capturing images from multiple process steps, characterizing noise from previous steps, subtracting noise images from current step images, and identifying defects in the difference images. This segmentation makes the complex multi-step processing more manageable and implementable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11921052B2Inspection with previous step subtraction
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 KLA CORP
  • US11921052B2 patent drawing
  • US11921052B2 patent drawing
  • US11921052B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inspection system may generate first-step images of multiple sample regions after a first process step and generate second-step images of the sample regions after a second process step, where the second process step modifies the sample in at least one of the sample regions. The system may further identify one of the sample regions as a test region and at least some of the remaining sample regions as comparison regions, where the second-step image of the test region is a test image and the second-step images of the comparison regions are comparison images. The system may further generate a multi-step difference image by subtracting a combination of at least one of the second-step comparison images and at least two of the first-step images from the test image. The system may further identify defects in the test region associated with the second process step based on the multi-step difference image.