Multi-threaded Type Resolver with Versioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional command line programming language compilers are single-threaded, leading to duplication of work and race conditions between threads during type resolution in multi-threaded environments, which can result in deadlocks due to the batch-oriented nature of their work.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-threaded type resolver with versioning, where each thread acquires a lock on a type, retrieves the latest version, creates a new immutable copy, and updates the type repository, allowing other threads to inspect prior versions and avoid duplicating work, while detecting potential deadlocks by analyzing type dependencies and cycles in the resolution graph.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-threaded type resolution is implemented, then compilation productivity is improved, but race conditions and deadlocks occur due to shared access to type data structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompilation speedVSAvoidthread safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the type resolution process into independent segments by creating separate resolution graphs for each thread. Each thread maintains its own resolution graph and processes types independently, eliminating race conditions while improving compilation speed through parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a mediator mechanism that coordinates between threads by checking for cycles in the resolution graph before allowing a thread to proceed. This mediator prevents deadlocks by detecting potential circular dependencies and blocking one thread from acquiring the lock, thus ensuring thread safety while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional single-threaded compilation is used, then thread safety is maintained, but duplication of work occurs and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread safetyVSAvoidcompilation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the compilation workload into independent threads, each processing different types or files simultaneously. This segmentation enables parallel compilation while maintaining thread safety through independent resolution graphs, thereby increasing productivity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-checking for cycles in the resolution graph before a thread begins processing a type. This preliminary detection prevents potential deadlocks and ensures that threads can proceed independently, optimizing compilation speed while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If locks are acquired for each type during resolution, then thread safety is ensured, but deadlock situations may arise from circular dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread safetyVSAvoidlock management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary cycle detection in the resolution graph before a thread acquires a lock on a type. By checking for circular dependencies in advance, the system can prevent deadlock situations without requiring complex lock management, thus maintaining thread safety while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the resolution graph for cycles and using this information to control lock acquisition. When a cycle is detected, the system provides feedback to block the thread from acquiring the lock, ensuring thread safety without introducing complex locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If threads independently resolve types, then productivity is improved, but work duplication occurs when threads access the same type

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompilation speedVSAvoidcomputation waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the type resolution process by assigning different types to different threads based on independent resolution graphs. This segmentation ensures that threads work on different types simultaneously, improving productivity while avoiding computation waste from duplicate work on the same type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing resolution graphs and checking for cycles before threads begin processing. This preliminary setup ensures that threads can proceed independently without duplicating work, optimizing both productivity and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7805712B2System and method for multi-threaded resolver with versioning
Publication Date: 2010.09.28 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US7805712B2 patent drawing
  • US7805712B2 patent drawing
  • US7805712B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for resolving a type in a programming language to a resolve stage is provided. The method includes determining whether a version at the resolve stage of the type exists. The method further includes, if the version at the resolve stage does not exist, allowing a thread exclusive access to the type, resolving the type from an original resolve stage to the resolve stage, by the thread, by adding resolution information for the resolve stage to the type, and creating the version of the type based on the resolving by creating a copy of the type, where the copy of the type is at the resolve stage. Two or more versions are associated with the type, and the two or more versions are at different resolve stages.