Multivalent Antibody Modular Linker Design for Epitope Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multivalent antibody technologies face challenges in efficiently producing high-quality antibodies with three or more binding domains, as existing formats are time-consuming, costly, and prone to stability and immunogenicity issues, with limitations in targeting a variety of antigens due to restrictive linkers and forced light chain pairing.

Innovation Solution

A modular format for multivalent antibodies using a base antibody portion with additional binding domains connected via linkers, employing a common variable region and hinge sequences to ensure stability and flexibility, allowing for simultaneous binding to multiple epitopes without extensive engineering, and utilizing transgenic animals to generate diverse cognate chains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing multivalent antibody formats are used, then antibody binding capability is achieved, but production time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The antibody is divided into modular binding domains (Fab arms) that can be independently designed and assembled. Each Fab arm contains a variable region for antigen binding and a constant region for structural stability, allowing parallel development and rapid assembly into multivalent configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a universal platform where the same base antibody structure can be configured with different numbers and types of binding domains (bispecific, trispecific, tetraspecific) by simply changing the linker regions, eliminating the need to redesign the entire antibody for each application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional multivalent antibody formats are used, then binding domains are created, but stability and immunogenicity issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidimmunogenicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The linker regions are specifically engineered with distinct properties for each binding domain configuration. The linker sequences are optimized to provide the right balance of flexibility and stability for each specific antibody format, reducing unwanted immunogenic responses while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention systematically varies parameters such as linker length, composition, and configuration to optimize the balance between stability and immunogenicity. By adjusting these parameters across different binding domain arrangements, the antibody maintains high stability while minimizing immunogenic responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If restrictive linkers are used in multivalent antibodies, then binding domains are connected, but targeting capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantigen targeting capabilityVSAvoidlinker structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linker regions are designed with dynamic properties that allow them to adapt to different spatial arrangements of binding domains. The linkers can flex and rotate to accommodate various antigen configurations, enabling the antibody to target multiple antigens with different orientations and distances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each linker region is locally optimized for its specific position and function within the multivalent antibody structure. Different linkers with tailored sequences and properties are used in different locations to provide the optimal balance of flexibility, stability, and targeting capability for each specific binding domain arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If forced light chain pairing is used, then antibody structure is simplified, but diversity in cognate chain generation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecognate chain diversityVSAvoidpairing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The antibody chains are segmented into independent variable regions that can be generated and paired in multiple combinations. This segmentation allows for the creation of diverse cognate chain pairs without forcing a single pairing configuration, enabling exploration of multiple antigen specificities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs partial pairing strategies where not all chains are forced into a single configuration. By allowing partial freedom in chain pairing, the system generates a broader diversity of functional antibody configurations while maintaining manageable manufacturing complexity through standardized modular components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240360217A1Multivalent antibody
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 MERUS NV
  • US20240360217A1 patent drawing
  • US20240360217A1 patent drawing
  • US20240360217A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a multivalent antibody which comprises: a base antibody portion which comprises two binding domains; and at least one additional binding domain, wherein the base antibody portion is connected by a linker to the at least one additional binding domain, wherein each binding domain of the base antibody portion and each of the at least one additional binding domains all have a common variable region, and wherein the linker comprises a hinge sequence or a sequence derived from a hinge sequence. The invention also relates to a multivalent antibody which comprises: a base antibody portion which comprises two binding domains; and at least one additional binding domain, wherein at least one additional binding domain comprises a CH1 region and is connected to the base antibody portion by said linker, linking a variable region of the base antibody portion and the CH1 region, and wherein the multivalent antibody binds to at least three different epitopes.