Multivariate Cell Selection Using Weighted Process Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for selecting target cells from candidate cells are inefficient due to the complexity of processing large amounts of data, subjective analysis, and the challenge of setting hard limits for product quality attributes, leading to incorrect cell selection and resource misallocation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that correlates data from multiple processes using multivariate evaluation criteria, including weights, prioritization ranges, and targets, to calculate scores for candidate cells and rank them objectively, thereby selecting the most suitable target cells for cell cultivation or product production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional data analysis methods are used to evaluate candidate cells, then multiple technicians can analyze data using spreadsheet programs, but the analysis becomes inconsistent and subjective, consuming many hours or days

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of cell selectionVSAvoidtime for data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis by technicians using spreadsheet programs with an automated computational system. The multivariate analysis system automatically processes process data, applies evaluation criteria, and ranks candidate cells, eliminating subjective human analysis while significantly reducing processing time from many hours or days to a rapid automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the analysis approach by changing from univariate or simple multivariate analysis to a comprehensive multivariate evaluation system that simultaneously considers multiple process parameters and product quality attributes with weighted priorities. This parameter transformation enables consistent, objective cell selection while automating the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If hard limits are set for product quality attributes to filter candidate cells, then selection criteria become simpler, but the best performing candidate cells may be incorrectly excluded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of selection criteriaVSAvoidaccuracy of cell selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying hard limits that completely exclude candidates failing any single criterion, the patent uses a weighted evaluation system where candidates receive scores based on how well they meet multiple criteria. This partial action approach allows candidates to compensate for weaknesses in one area with strengths in others, preventing premature exclusion of potentially excellent candidates while maintaining operational simplicity through automated scoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces static hard limits with dynamic weighted evaluation criteria that can be adjusted based on process priorities and conditions. The multivariate analysis system dynamically calculates scores based on weighted combinations of process parameters and product quality attributes, allowing flexible optimization without rigid exclusion thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If multiple process parameters and product quality attributes are evaluated simultaneously, then more comprehensive cell assessment is achieved, but data processing complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of cell evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex multivariate evaluation into manageable components: (1) data collection from process systems, (2) application of weighted evaluation criteria for different parameters and attributes, (3) calculation of composite scores, and (4) ranking of candidate cells. This segmentation reduces processing complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation by breaking down the complex analysis into systematic, automated steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes raw process data through multivariate analysis algorithms. This intermediary system transforms complex multi-parameter data into simplified ranked outputs, mediating between the complexity of simultaneous parameter evaluation and the need for straightforward cell selection decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If extensive data is collected from multiple processes to improve selection accuracy, then better cell performance can be identified, but incorrect selection may still occur leading to resource misallocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of target cell identificationVSAvoidwaste of resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the multivariate analysis system continuously evaluates candidate cells against weighted criteria and provides ranked results that guide selection decisions. This feedback loop ensures that resources are allocated to the highest-ranked candidates based on comprehensive data analysis, minimizing the risk of incorrect selection and subsequent resource waste while maximizing the likelihood of identifying truly superior cell lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20210383893A1Multivariate approach for cell selection
Publication Date: 2021.12.09 SARTORIUS STEDIM DATA ANALYTICS AB
  • US20210383893A1 patent drawing
  • US20210383893A1 patent drawing
  • US20210383893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to some aspects of the disclosure, a computer-implemented method, a computer program and a process control device for selecting at least one set of target cells from multiple sets of candidate cells are provided. The method can include receiving data collected from a plurality of processes, wherein each of the processes produces a distinct set of candidate cells. The method further comprises the received data including values of process outputs being a product quality attribute or a key performance indicator for selecting the target cells.