Multivariate Model for Injection Molding Process Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current injection molding processes face challenges in achieving consistent quality and efficiency due to the complex relationships between operating and process parameters, which are often managed independently, leading to inefficiencies and increased downtime.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system utilizing a multivariate model, specifically based on principal component analysis, to optimize and predict process parameters, allowing for real-time adjustments and fault detection, thereby improving process stability and reducing human error.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If each operating parameter is controlled independently using traditional controllers, then the control system is simple to implement, but the root cause of process deviations is ignored and quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent parameter controls into a unified multivariate control system. The control system integrates temperature, pressure, speed, and other operating parameters into a single coordinated control framework that considers inter-parameter relationships, thereby improving quality consistency while managing complexity through systematic integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where process deviations are detected, analyzed to identify root causes, and corrected through automated adjustments. The system continuously monitors process parameters, compares them against target values, and applies corrective actions based on multivariate analysis, enabling sustained quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If continuous in-process tweaking of process parameters is performed to maintain quality, then quality levels can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to increased downtime and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality levelVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated self-adjusting control system that performs in-process tweaking without human intervention. The system autonomously detects process deviations, analyzes root causes using multivariate models, and adjusts operating parameters automatically, eliminating the need for manual intervention and associated downtime, thereby maintaining quality while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs predictive analysis using multivariate models to anticipate process deviations before they occur. By identifying trends and potential issues in advance, the system can proactively adjust parameters to prevent quality deviations, reducing the need for reactive corrections and minimizing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are installed to monitor process parameters in real-time, then process control accuracy is improved, but system cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess monitoring accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multivariate control system that uses existing sensors to monitor multiple process parameters simultaneously. The system processes and analyzes multiple data streams from temperature, pressure, speed, and other sensors through a unified control algorithm, enabling comprehensive process monitoring without requiring separate dedicated sensors for each parameter, thus reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a software-based multivariate analysis layer that acts as an intermediary between sensors and control actions. This software layer integrates data from multiple sensors, performs complex analysis, and generates control decisions, reducing the need for additional hardware sensors while maintaining high measurement precision through sophisticated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If traditional open-loop or limited closed-loop controllers are used, then the control system is easy to operate, but adaptability to slow-moving process changes is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller usabilityVSAvoidresponse to process changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system that adapts to changing process conditions in real-time. The multivariate model continuously updates its analysis based on current process parameters and trends, enabling the system to respond to slow-moving process changes such as material drift, tool wear, and environmental variations. The system adjusts control strategies dynamically while maintaining an intuitive interface for operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8855804B2Controlling a discrete-type manufacturing process with a multivariate model
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 MKS INSTR INC
  • US8855804B2 patent drawing
  • US8855804B2 patent drawing
  • US8855804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are methods, systems, and a computer-readable storage medium for controlling a discrete-type manufacturing process (e.g., an injection molding process) with a multivariate model. Data representing process parameters, operating parameters, or both of the manufacturing process are received. The received data is compared with a multivariate model that approximates the manufacturing process to provide a result. Upon the result of the comparing satisfying a condition, one or more values for a set of operating parameters for the manufacturing process are determined. When the one or more determined values for the set of operating parameters satisfies a criterion, at least one operating parameter of the manufacturing process is updated.