Multivariate Optical Computing for Phytoplankton Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sensors are inadequate for in situ, detailed discrimination of phytoplankton size and community composition in ocean waters, as they suffer from poor discrimination abilities and high costs, bulkiness, and high power requirements, limiting their ability to provide comprehensive information on phytoplankton morphology and species composition.

Innovation Solution

A multivariate optical computing (MOC) based instrument that uses spectral excitation fluorescence and multivariate optical elements (MOEs) to continuously measure and classify phytoplankton in water samples, enabling discrimination between different taxa by analyzing fluorescence excitation spectra and providing detailed information on size and community composition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If flow cytometric instruments are used for automated characterization of phytoplankton communities, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephytoplankton discrimination abilityVSAvoidinstrument complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex spectral analysis task into multiple discrete optical filters, each targeting specific wavelength ranges. This allows the system to achieve flow cytometry-level discrimination without requiring a full spectrometer, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical scanning system of traditional spectrometers with a static array of optical filters. This substitution eliminates moving parts and complex mechanics while achieving comparable spectral discrimination through parallel optical paths, reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If satellite-based ocean color sensors are used for phytoplankton monitoring, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidcommunity composition characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using multiple optical filters with different spectral characteristics at different locations in the optical path. Each filter provides specialized spectral information for specific phytoplankton groups, enabling precise community composition characterization while maintaining broad monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If bulk optical spectroscopy is used for phytoplankton analysis, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument simplicityVSAvoidspectral separation ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous spectrum into discrete wavelength bands using multiple optical filters. This segmentation provides bulk optical spectroscopy's simplicity while achieving spectral separation precision by targeting specific absorption features of different phytoplankton pigments with dedicated filters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If in situ sensors are deployed for continuous phytoplankton monitoring, then productivity is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous monitoring capabilityVSAvoidpower requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by using a rotating filter wheel that sequentially presents different optical filters to the light path. This periodic filtering approach enables continuous monitoring with low power consumption, as the system only requires intermittent filter changes rather than continuous spectral scanning or broad-spectrum detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MOC instrument provides efficient, cost-effective, and compact means for continuous monitoring of phytoplankton, improving discrimination abilities and reducing power requirements, enabling accurate classification and size determination of phytoplankton species, thereby enhancing oceanographic research and monitoring capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

the multivariate optical computing device illuminates an area of the fluid sample as it flows through the multivariate optical computing device to elicit a continuous series of spectral responses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence excitation: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS8902423B2Classification using multivariate optical computing
Publication Date: 2014.12.02 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US8902423B2 patent drawing
  • US8902423B2 patent drawing
  • US8902423B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for in situ detection and classification of analyte within a fluid sample are provided. In one embodiment, the method can include: (a) continuously flowing the fluid sample through a multivariate optical computing device, wherein the multivariate optical computing device illuminates an area of the fluid sample as it flows through the multivariate optical computing device to elicit a continuous series of spectral responses; (b) continuously measuring the series of multivariate spectral responses as the fluid sample flows through the multivariate optical computing device; (c) detecting an analyte (e.g., phytoplankton) in the sample based on an multivariate spectral response of the plurality of spectral responses; and (d) classifying the analyte based on the multivariate spectral response generated by the analyte.