Multiwall Sheet Sound Insulation via Acoustic Impedance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multiwall sheets face challenges in achieving increased sound insulation without significant weight gain, maintaining transparency, and minimizing manufacturing costs and steps.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a sound insulating material with a velocity of sound greater than the plastic walls and an acoustic impedance of at least 5 MRayl into the cavities of multiwall sheets, specifically using materials like silica, to enhance sound transmission loss and absorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the weight of the multiwall sheet is increased to improve sound insulation, then sound insulation properties are improved, but weight savings and cost-effectiveness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound insulationVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the multiwall sheet's inherent porous cavity structure to accommodate sound insulating material. The cavities between walls serve as porous spaces that can be filled with acoustic materials having specific acoustic impedances, allowing sound insulation improvement without adding significant weight compared to solid materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure by filling the cavities with sound insulating material that has different acoustic properties (higher acoustic impedance) than the plastic walls. This composite approach combines the lightweight advantage of plastic with the sound insulation benefits of denser materials, resolving the contradiction between weight and sound insulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sound insulating material is added to improve sound transmission loss, then sound insulation is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound transmission lossVSAvoidmanufacturing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multiwall sheet is pre-formed with cavities during the extrusion process, creating ready-to-fill spaces for sound insulating material. This preliminary structuring allows for subsequent simple filling operations, avoiding the need for complex post-manufacturing assembly steps and reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sound insulating material is nested within the pre-formed cavities of the multiwall sheet structure. This nesting approach allows the sound insulating material to be accommodated within the existing structural framework without requiring additional external components or complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If transparent multiwall sheet is designed for sound insulation, then sound insulation properties are improved, but transparency is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound insulation propertiesVSAvoidtransparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by filling only specific cavities with sound insulating material while leaving other cavities empty or partially filled. This selective filling allows different regions of the multiwall sheet to have different properties - some areas provide sound insulation while other areas maintain transparency, resolving the contradiction between these two requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a significant increase in sound transmission loss, up to 500% improvement, while maintaining transparency and reducing weight, thus addressing the need for improved sound insulation in lightweight, cost-effective multiwall sheets.

Implementation Method 1

a sound insulating material disposed in an area between two adjacent walls; wherein the sound insulating material has a velocity of sound greater than the velocity of sound of the plastic walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound insulation: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 2

wherein the sound insulating material has an acoustic impedance of greater than or equal to 5 MRayl

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic impedance: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentEP2748384B1A multiwall sheet and methods for applying said sheet
Publication Date: 2017.07.19 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • EP2748384B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2748384B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2748384B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A multiwall sheet (10) comprises plastic walls, wherein the walls comprise a first wall (12); a second wall (14); and a transverse wall (16), wherein the first wall (12), the second wall (14), and the transverse wall (16) extend longitudinally; and a rib (18) extending between adjacent walls; and a sound insulating material disposed in an area between two adjacent walls, wherein the sound insulating material has a velocity of sound greater than the velocity of sound of the plastic walls.