Munition Packaging with Blast Mitigating Inserts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current packaging solutions for multiple munitions do not meet Insensitive Munitions (IM) compliance requirements, as they fail to adequately prevent unintentional detonation due to lack of labyrinthine paths between munitions, leading to potential large-scale explosions during storage and transportation.

Innovation Solution

A packaging system with inserts featuring recesses and labyrinthine paths between munitions, made from blast mitigating materials like expanded polypropylene (EPP) or glass reinforced plastic (GRP), which absorb and dissipate blast energy, preventing direct blast paths and reducing sympathetic detonation risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple munitions are stored in containers without labyrinthine paths between them, then the packaging structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the risk of unintentional detonation increases due to direct blast paths between munitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against unintentional detonationVSAvoidpackaging structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging structure is divided into separate inserts, each containing individual munitions. The inserts are separated by labyrinthine paths that segment the blast propagation paths between munitions, preventing direct transmission of blast waves while maintaining structural organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Labyrinthine paths filled with blast mitigating material serve as intermediary elements between adjacent munitions. These paths act as mediators that attenuate blast waves, shock waves, and fragment transmission while allowing the munitions to remain securely positioned in their respective inserts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If blast mitigating material is used to attenuate shock waves and protect munitions, then the safety against unintentional detonation improves, but the manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against blast wavesVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging utilizes porous blast mitigating materials such as expanded polypropylene (EPP) foam within the labyrinthine paths and surrounding the munitions. These porous materials effectively attenuate shock waves and fragment transmission through their cellular structure while being relatively cost-effective to manufacture using standard foam extrusion processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging employs composite construction combining rigid container walls with flexible blast mitigating material inserts. This composite approach leverages the strengths of both materials - the structural integrity of the container and the blast attenuation properties of the foam material - while optimizing manufacturing through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If inserts with labyrinthine paths are used to separate munitions, then direct blast paths are eliminated, but the ease of loading munitions into the package decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast path separationVSAvoidmunitions loading ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging is segmented into multiple inserts that can be independently assembled and loaded. Each insert contains individual munitions positioned within recesses, allowing munitions to be loaded separately into each insert before the inserts are assembled together with labyrinthine paths between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Munitions are pre-positioned within the recesses of individual inserts before the inserts are assembled into the final package configuration. This preliminary placement facilitates easy loading while ensuring proper spacing and separation through the labyrinthine paths once the inserts are mated together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If thick insert material is used between munitions to reduce sympathetic detonation, then the safety improvement is achieved, but the volume and weight of the packaging increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against sympathetic detonationVSAvoidpackaging weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging utilizes porous blast mitigating materials such as expanded polypropylene (EPP) foam within the labyrinthine paths and surrounding the munitions. These porous materials effectively attenuate shock waves and fragment transmission through their cellular structure while being relatively cost-effective to manufacture using standard foam extrusion processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging optimizes the thickness and density parameters of the blast mitigating material to achieve the minimum required protection level. By carefully selecting the appropriate foam density and thickness, the design provides adequate protection against sympathetic detonation while minimizing unnecessary weight and volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The packaging system effectively attenuates blast waves, reducing the risk of unintentional detonation and damage by providing a cushioning effect and rotational symmetry for easy assembly, while also minimizing static build-up through carbon-rich materials, thus ensuring safer storage and transport of multiple munitions.

Implementation Method 1

The provision of such a package with one or more labyrinthine paths between munitions in the package provides a package with no direct blast path between the munitions and the voids within the material which form the labyrinthine paths provide the desired cushioning effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

The absence of a direct, straight line path between the munitions reduces the transmission of radiation, gas and shrapnel and attenuates the transmission of the shock wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave attenuation: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 3

The blast mitigating material preferably contains carbon black for the purpose of allowing static charges to migrate and dissipate. This minimizes the risk of static build-up within the package

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStatic charge dissipation: Electrostatic Discharge

Data Source

PatentUS8079465B2Safety packaging
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • US8079465B2 patent drawing
  • US8079465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A package for the safe storage and transportation of munitions comprising at least one insert provided with a recess to receive each munition separately such that in use the munitions are separated by the insert material and one or more labyrinthine paths exist between the munitions. The moulds may be made of blast mitigating material for the effective dissipation of energy on unintentional detonation of a munition.