Muscle Activity Remote Control for Hands-Free Device Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for remote devices are not ergonomic and intuitive, requiring users to hold a control in their hand and limiting their ability to perform other tasks.

Innovation Solution

A control system that utilizes muscular activity sensors to detect electrical activity of a user's muscles, generating control instructions without the need for hand-held controls, allowing users to control remote devices through muscle contractions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a hand-held control device is used to control remote devices, then control functionality is achieved, but user hands are occupied and cannot perform other tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand freedomVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical hand-held control system with a physiological signal-based control system. Muscular activity sensors detect electrical signals from muscle contractions, and these signals are processed to generate control instructions for the remote device. This substitution eliminates the need for physical contact with control devices while maintaining full control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that translates muscular activity signals into control instructions. This intermediary layer includes signal processing circuits and control logic that convert physiological signals into meaningful commands for the remote device, bridging the gap between muscle contraction and device control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional control interfaces are used, then control functionality is provided, but the interface is not ergonomic or intuitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface ergonomicsVSAvoidcontrol system components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The control system leverages the user's own physiological signals as the control input mechanism. By detecting muscular activity that the user naturally produces during normal muscle contractions, the system eliminates the need for specialized control interfaces. The user's own body becomes the control device, providing an intuitive and ergonomic experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables users to control remote devices while keeping their hands free, maintaining full control over their hands and allowing simultaneous performance of other tasks, with intuitive and unobtrusive operation.

Implementation Method 1

a muscular activity sensor arranged to detect muscular activity information from the user by measuring electrical activity of at least one of the user's muscles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical activity measurement: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12399491B2Control system for controlling a device remote from the system
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 SAFRAN ELECTRONICS & DEFENSE (FR)
  • US12399491B2 patent drawing
  • US12399491B2 patent drawing
  • US12399491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for controlling at least one remote device includes a communication module for transmitting control instructions to the remote device; a processor unit for generating said control instructions and sending them to said communication module; and a user interface for detecting information from a user. The user interface includes at least one muscle activity sensor for detecting muscular activity information from the user by measuring the electrical activity of at least one of the user's muscles, and the user interface generates muscular activity signals representative of detected muscular activity and sends them to the processor unit, and the processor unit generates the control instructions as a function of the muscular activity signals received by the processor unit.