Musical Interaction Assist Device for Emotional Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic musical instruments lack interactive and friendly responses to users, providing mechanical assistance but not emotional engagement, unlike interactive robots that react to human interactions.

Innovation Solution

A musical interaction assisting apparatus connected to electronic musical instruments, comprising input, interpreting, and response generating devices to detect and respond to user actions acoustically, visually, and physically, learning from user interactions to provide personalized and engaging responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional help functions are used to assist users with mechanical manipulation guidance, then operational assistance is provided, but user engagement and emotional interaction are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational assistanceVSAvoidinteractive response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the interaction assistance function into multiple independent modules: acoustic input detection, visual input detection, physical input detection, interpretation device, response generation device, and multiple output channels (acoustic response, visual response, physical response). This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks while maintaining overall system flexibility and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The assisting apparatus is designed with multi-functionality to detect various types of user inputs (acoustic, visual, physical) and provide corresponding responses through multiple channels. The learning device enables the system to adapt to different users and contexts, making the single apparatus capable of handling diverse interaction scenarios beyond traditional mechanical help functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If interactive robots are used to provide friendly responses to human interactions, then user engagement is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteractive response capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an interpreting device as an intermediary between the input detection means and the response generation device. This intermediary processes and understands user inputs before generating appropriate responses, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high adaptability. The learning device acts as another intermediary that bridges user behavior patterns and response strategies, reducing the need for complex hard-coded interaction logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the learning device continuously learns from user interactions and adjusts the response generation accordingly. This feedback loop enables the system to improve its interactive capabilities over time without requiring increases in hardware complexity, as the adaptation occurs through software-based learning algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple detection and response channels are implemented to provide comprehensive interaction, then user engagement and personalization are enhanced, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized interaction capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple detection capabilities (acoustic, visual, physical) and response channels into a single integrated assisting apparatus. Rather than using separate devices for each function, the system combines them into one unified unit that processes various input types and generates corresponding responses through coordinated working of its internal modules, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive interaction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The learning device enables the system to adapt its behavior by changing operational parameters based on learned user patterns. Instead of requiring separate hardware configurations for different interaction styles, the system adjusts its response parameters (timing, tone, type of response) through software-based learning, achieving personalization without proportional increases in hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7750223B2Musical interaction assisting apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.07.06 YAMAHA CORP
  • US7750223B2 patent drawing
  • US7750223B2 patent drawing
  • US7750223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A musical interaction assisting apparatus is to enhance friendliness between an electronic musical instrument and the player. The player's actions are detected acoustically, visually or physically, and the interaction assisting apparatus interprets the detected player's actions and generates interactive responses thereto. The interactive responses are outputted acoustically, visually or physically for the player, and electronically to control the electronic musical instrument. The interaction assisting apparatus also has a learning function to provide proper responses to the player.