Multiple Torques Inertial Thruster Damping Precession

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inertial thruster technologies fail to adequately address the issue of strategic damping and cyclical displacement of precessable mass to achieve unidirectional motion, relying on gravity and not effectively redirecting torque-induced precession.

Innovation Solution

The development of a Multiple Torques Inertial Thruster (MUTINT) that strategically dampens and redirects torque-induced precession using hurrying or delaying techniques, allowing for cyclical displacement of precessable mass without reactive engagement with a surface or fluid medium, incorporating a motorized spinning rotor, powertrain, and torquing system for active or passive damping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional inertial thruster designs are used, then the device can generate thrust, but it suffers from significant rearward reactions during the minimized-thrust phase that reduce overall efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust efficiencyVSAvoidrearward reaction force
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by using a damping mechanism that actively counteracts the rearward reaction force before it fully develops during the minimized-thrust phase. The damping torque is applied in opposition to the precessional motion, preventing the buildup of harmful reactive forces and redirecting them into productive forward thrust during the maximized-thrust phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful rearward reaction force into beneficial forward thrust by utilizing the damping mechanism to redirect precessional energy. The damping torque that would normally dissipate energy as heat is instead harnessed to redirect the precessional motion, transforming the wasteful rearward reaction into useful propulsive force during the power stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Adaptability or versatility

If gravity-based inertial thrusters are used, then the device can achieve unidirectional motion, but it requires reactive engagement with a surface or fluid medium which limits operational versatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational environment flexibilityVSAvoidreactive engagement requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the dependency on external gravitational fields and surface reactions by implementing a self-contained damping mechanism. The inertial thruster uses internal damping torques applied to the precessing mass to achieve unidirectional motion, eliminating the need for external surfaces or fluid media that traditional gravity-based designs require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical gravity-based reaction system with a damping-based inertial control system. Instead of relying on gravitational forces and surface reactions, the system uses controlled damping torques applied to a precessing mass to generate thrust, enabling operation in environments where gravity or surfaces are unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If precession is allowed to occur freely, then the device can maintain rotational momentum, but it creates torque-induced precession that redirects thrust away from the desired direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational speedVSAvoidthrust direction control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the damping torque adjustable and phase-synchronized with the precessional motion. The damping mechanism is not static but dynamically controlled, with the torque magnitude and timing varying throughout the operational cycle to optimize both the maintenance of rotational momentum and the control of thrust direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensors to detect the precessional phase and angular position, then using this information to control the timing and magnitude of the damping torque application. This closed-loop control ensures that the damping torque is applied at the optimal moment to redirect precession without compromising rotational momentum, maintaining precise thrust direction control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient inertial thrust by reducing initial rearward reactions, enhancing acceleration during maximized-thrust phases, and improving overall thrust efficiency by redirecting precession and immobilizing the central axle to negate gyroscopic effects.

Implementation Method 1

the effect on one of the gyro's axes when an attempt is made to change its direction on any of it's three axes. In a given gyro, where the axis of spin is horizontal (axis X), an external torque on axis Y will cause precession not about axis Y but on axis Z

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic precession: Precession

Implementation Method 2

The popular conception of the word 'action' is often poorly defined and therefore misunderstood. I will give an example of a commonly accepted 'action' that does does have an apparent equal and opposite reaction. When a figure skater begins a spin, his or her arms are often extended and resultantly the rotational speed is minimal. However, when the skater performs the action of pulling his or her arms inwardly then instantly that action 'causes' the rotational speed to increase dramatically in the exact same direction as the slower spin. The results of the 'action' of drawing in one's arms would appear to be distinct from the resulting action. It is common knowledge that the increase in the skater's rotational speed in this scenario is due to the conservation of angular momentum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular momentum conservation: Angular Momentum Conservation

Implementation Method 3

an external torque on axis Y will cause precession not about axis Y but on axis Z. Thus, an accelerating mass 'm' applied to the axis of a spinning rotor (ωs) having a rotational inertia (Is) causes precession (ωp)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Data Source

PatentUS11047369B1Multiple torques inertial thruster engine and methodology
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 ABERS MARK DAVID
  • US11047369B1 patent drawing
  • US11047369B1 patent drawing
  • US11047369B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention discloses an inertial-thruster architecture wherein active and passive damping techniques result in the redirection, absorption, neutralization, and/or enhancement of the effect of torque-induced precession on both oscillatory and rotary devices. These novel mechanical and methodological embodiments demonstrate that the redirection of precession during the appropriate phase of operations will achieve the objective of rectilinear movement when combined with the displacement of one or more precessable masses.