Mutual Inductance Feedback for Paralleled Phase Leg Switches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In power converters for electrified vehicles, parallel switching devices in phase legs often experience unbalanced current sharing due to variations in gate threshold voltage, leading to increased switching loss and energy dissipation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of feedback loops with mutual inductances that generate opposing voltages to balance current magnitudes between parallel switching devices, adjusting the gate drive signal dynamically to reduce current imbalances and shorten switching times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If parallel switching devices are used to increase current capacity, then the current handling capability is improved, but current sharing becomes unbalanced due to gate threshold voltage variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent handling capabilityVSAvoidcurrent sharing balance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops with mutual inductances that sense current differences between parallel switching devices and dynamically adjust gate drive signals to balance current sharing. The feedback mechanism detects current imbalances and automatically compensates for gate threshold voltage variations, maintaining balanced current distribution across all parallel devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the gate drive signal parameters (voltage level, pulse width) based on real-time current measurements. By adjusting these parameters through feedback control, the system compensates for device variations and maintains optimal current sharing among parallel switching devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If gate drive signals are adjusted to balance current sharing, then current balance is improved, but switching time increases due to additional control complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent balanceVSAvoidswitching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loops continuously monitor current distribution and provide real-time adjustments to gate drive signals. This closed-loop control enables the system to achieve current balance dynamically without requiring pre-synchronization or complex timing adjustments, thereby minimizing impact on switching speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The gate drive signals are made dynamic and adaptive rather than fixed. The system continuously adjusts drive parameters based on real-time conditions, allowing the switching devices to maintain optimal current sharing while responding quickly to changing load conditions and switching requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If feedback loops with mutual inductances are implemented, then current mismatch is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent mismatch reductionVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loops use mutual inductances to sense current differences between parallel switching devices. This magnetic coupling provides a direct proportionality between sensed voltage and current difference, enabling simple yet effective current balancing without requiring complex measurement circuits or additional sensing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The mutual inductance acts as an intermediary element that couples the current sensing function to the gate drive control. This intermediary provides a straightforward magnetic coupling mechanism that translates current differences into corrective gate drive adjustments, simplifying the overall control architecture while achieving precise current balancing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces current mismatches by up to 77% and minimizes switching losses, enhancing the efficiency of power converters in electrified vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

The feedback loop has a first mutual inductance with a current path of the first switching device and has a second mutual inductance with a current path of the second switching device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Common source inductance refers to an inductance shared by the main power loop (i.e., the drain-to-source or collector-to-emitter power output of the transistor) and the gate driver loop (i.e., gate-to-source or gate-to-emitter) in a power switching transistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCommon source inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11489437B2DC inverter/converter current balancing for paralleled phase leg switches
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11489437B2 patent drawing
  • US11489437B2 patent drawing
  • US11489437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Current imbalances between parallel switching devices in a power converter half leg are reduced. A gate driver generates a nominal PWM gate drive signal for a respective half leg. A first feedback loop couples the nominal PWM gate drive signal to a gate terminal of a respective first switching device. The first feedback loop has a first mutual inductance with a current path of a first parallel switching device and has a second mutual inductance with a current path of a second parallel switching device. The first and second mutual inductances are arranged to generate opposing voltages in the first feedback loop, so that when all the parallel switching devices carry equal current then the voltages cancel.