Mutual Watching System for Care Groups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing patient surveillance systems fix roles between medical examinees and staff, limiting flexibility for mutual assistance, which can lead to uneven care burdens and reduced willingness to provide care among group members.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that evaluates the degrees of contribution of group members providing care to a member in need, and presents these evaluation results to the group, promoting mutual assistance and encouraging equitable care distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If roles are fixed between medical examinees and staff, then the surveillance function is clear and reliable, but the adaptability and flexibility for mutual assistance are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurveillance function clarityVSAvoidmutual assistance flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic role assignment where members can switch between watcher and watched roles based on real-time needs. The system allows any group member to become a watcher temporarily when someone needs care, rather than having fixed roles. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by maintaining role clarity through structured assignment while enabling flexibility through easy role switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes all group members universally capable of performing both watcher and watched functions. Each member is equipped with the ability to provide surveillance and receive surveillance, allowing anyone to take on either role as needed. This multi-functionality approach enables the system to adapt to different care needs while maintaining clear role definitions during each surveillance episode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If roles are not fixed to allow mutual assistance, then the adaptability increases, but the burden of care concentrates on specific members and reliability of care provision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual assistance flexibilityVSAvoidcare provision consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements evaluation mechanisms that provide feedback to all members about care provision status. Watchers receive feedback on their surveillance activities, and the system tracks contribution levels to ensure equitable distribution of care burdens. This feedback loop prevents care concentration on specific members by making contributions visible and adjustable, thereby maintaining both flexibility and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Members actively participate in selecting and managing their own surveillance needs and preferences. The system allows members to self-report their states and receive notifications based on their preferences, enabling them to take control of their care needs. This self-service approach distributes the burden of care management across all members rather than concentrating it, while maintaining reliable care provision through individual agency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If roles are not fixed, then mutual assistance flexibility improves, but the complexity of managing care distribution increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual assistance flexibilityVSAvoidcare management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary notification mechanism that mediates between members' care needs and potential watchers. When a member needs surveillance, the system automatically notifies appropriate group members based on predefined preferences and availability. This intermediary layer simplifies the management of flexible role assignment by handling the coordination automatically, reducing the complexity burden on members while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If fixed roles are assigned, then the simplicity of role assignment is maintained, but the willingness of members to provide care decreases due to uneven burden distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverole assignment simplicityVSAvoidcare contribution motivation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic role assignment where members can switch between watcher and watched roles based on real-time needs. The system allows any group member to become a watcher temporarily when someone needs care, rather than having fixed roles. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by maintaining role clarity through structured assignment while enabling flexibility through easy role switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250139540A1Information processing apparatus, mutual watching method, recording medium, and mutual watching system
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 NEC CORP
  • US20250139540A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139540A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139540A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an information processing apparatus, etc. capable of promoting mutual assistance among the members of a group (optimizing the manner of mutual assistance). The information processing apparatus includes: a member evaluating section for performing, based on a status of provision of care provided to a member who is inferred to be in a state of being in need of care from among members of a group and provided by one or more other members of the group, evaluations of degrees of contribution of the one or more other members to the group; and an evaluation result presenting section for presenting results of the evaluations to the members of the group. With this information processing apparatus, it is also possible to support decision-making performed by the members of a group.